The paper "Faulkner’ s A Rose for Emily" is a worthy example of a literature book review. The reviewer of Faulkner’ s A Rose for Emily here has adopted a rather first-person-centric addressing style. Its overemphasis on otherwise inconsequential details like moving into different cities and the authentic experiences associated with living in unfamiliar neighborhoods, is quite obsequious and unprofessional. The writer has adopted a very colloquial narrative style to describe an otherwise piece de resistance of Faulkner. The thematic and symbolic depth of the story requires a more versatile and articulate approach in critiquing (Randle, 2002).
The lack of logical coherence apart, the writer has invariably committed a very big mistake by wrongly emphasizing the significance of impact that new neighborhoods have on people. The writer also places undue emphasis on the house and its appearance. Indeed a huge castle-like house where the nobility of the Faulkner’ s time lived wouldn’ t have looked any different. Thus the writer has sacrificed effective characterization for overtly unsubstantial detail. The rigmarole-like presentation captures much less detail of what the story has to offer. The raison d’ ê tre of the presentation is lost in humorless illustrations of arcane scenery.
The typical lack of linguistic mastery is apparently the biggest drawback in the whole analysis. The writer has used even wrong words in the wrong places to ascribe abstract epithets to characters and objects, “ The setting in this story occupies a vital role in expressing Emily’ s solitude from the rest of the community” . Above all the writer repeats ad nauseam the adjectives to describe the pallid atmosphere, thus effectively preventing himself from critically focusing on the vulnerability of Emily to time-centric evolution.
Despite these shortcomings, there is a particular strength in the analysis, i.e. the writer has made a half-successful attempt to empathize with the reader by narrating the plight of Emily in colloquial, but yet an indefatigable style. Psychological connotations and denotations of the neophyte-like approach invariably have an appreciable impact on the reader.