Genocide in Bosnia - the Policy of Ethnic Cleansing by Norman Cigar – Book Report/Review Example

Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing

The paper “ Genocide in Bosnia - the policy of Ethnic Cleansing by Norman Cigar” is a  brilliant example of a book review on politics. The book under discussion is an epitome of the cruel mass killings in various parts of the world since time immemorial. It is a depiction of the trend of genocide cases that have ever occurred. The author outlines vividly in a crystal clear manner so as to avoid cases of repetition in that he points out the root cause of the issue at hand. Still, he goes at length to come up with ways that will make the prey aware of the forthcoming danger.

This is seen whereby he points out that the prey should be in a position to read both subtle and open signs of a forthcoming animosity. The political significance of the book is clearly illustrated by the writer whereby there is a comprehensible demonstration of the political influence being the most domineering force of the hostility in the former Yugoslavia. Thus every leader has a key role to positively reinforce peace since they are the most influential persons in the society (Cigar, 1995). The title of the book is no doubt eye-catching since it invokes one into getting thrilled to know what caused the massive killings in Bosnia.

It has a condensed aspect of the grass-root prompt that acted as a springboard for genocide. The ethnic cleansing is more or less of a metaphor in that it portrays how communities have an intrinsic urge to completely displace others to a level of wiping them out of the face of the earth to have a mono-ethnic society (Cigar, 1995). The topic is enclosed in inverted commas as an illustration that this kind of cleansing depicted in this society’ s mindset is contrary to the human moral standards.

Thus the topic is also ironic since the Yugoslavian “ ethnic cleansing” only perpetuated murder and heightened venomous hatred. It is also ironic as seen in the book that the war involved three parties whereby the Serbs and Croatians rose against the Muslims. The Muslims, in this case, were the culprits. Ordinarily, Muslims are seen to be the initiators of war and aggressive to defend their natives.

However, the turn out is different and one sees them as the sufferers and even being too naï ve to spell out danger from afar. Again one finds it a paradox whereby the international community is having weapon purchase restricted in this state so as to protect the Muslims. There is a universal belief that Muslims are the manufacturers of mass weapons and one is tempted to come into terms how these Muslims could have been that entire defenseless (Cigar, 1995). On the other hand, the Muslims are willing to stay as a unified state with the rest o the Serbs despite the harsh living conditions like living in tents with scanty resources.

One cannot avoid blaming the Muslims for allowing themselves to be the prey even after being persecuted by their oppressors and still clinging on them. This is a universal lesson that should be embraced in that it is pointless to stay in the midst of your oppressors just because of the fringe benefit that one is getting. This is because the cost is too high to bargain for which is worthless due to the negative impact it has that has far-reaching effects like genealogical acrimony and rivalry.


Cigar, N., 1995, Genocide in Bosnia The policy of Ethnic Cleansing, A&M University Press College Station, Texas.

Jones, A., 2001, Genocide war crimes and the West: Ending the culture of impunity, London, Sage.

Norman, M., 2001, Fires of hatred, ethnic cleansing in the 20th century, Cambridge, Harvard University Press.

Sadkovich, J., 1998, The US Media and Yugoslavia, Westport, Praeger Publishers.

Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
Contact Us