Seahenge: An Archaeological Conundrum by C. Watson – Book Report/Review Example

Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing

The paper "Seahenge: An Archaeological Conundrum by C. Watson" is a good example of a book review on archaeology. Watson’ s works are centered on the Holme a prehistoric monument that was located in the Holmes village which bordered the seashores of the English county of Norfolk. The artifact dates its origin back to the ancient Neopagan historical society that claimed it had a spiritual relevance to them. It is estimated to have been built in the Bronze Age in Britain. It is assumed to have been built for ritual purposes. Its design comprised of an outer ring that had fifty-five oak trunks forming a circular enclosure.

The artifact was named after Stonehenge which was a prehistoric structure that had its existence in Wiltshire. The excavations of the artifact brought mixed reactions from various groups with varying ideas. Watson’ s narrative writing focuses on the artifacts discovery, its excavation and the controversies that surrounded its origin and purpose (Watson 2005). The book review In the first chapter of this book, Watson aims to bring to the understanding of the reader on the actual events that surrounded the discovery of the Seating.

In his narration, the actual excavation of the Holme began in October 1998by the Norfolk Archeological Unit under the leadership of Mark Brennand. Prior to its excavation, the artifact was discovered by John Lorimer while on an expedition of catching shrimps n the company of his brother in law. John was a special needs worker who was also skilled and armature in the archeological field. The artifact was not easy to locate as the Bronze Age axe head was covered with silt.

Watson records that John was not aware of what the artifact was and decided to get an opinion on it from a friend who was a metal detectorist. Upon the detection of what the artifact was the trio decided to contact the Norwich Castle museum who at first thought it was an Anglosaxon fishing trap. It was later confirmed that it was the second of the type to be excavated in the previous few months. Upon further observation, Watson reveals that the groups were able to realize that the excavation had manmade construction origin (BBC 2008). The second and proceeding chapter reveals the excavation processes.

The English Heritage agreed to fund the excavation process. From Watson’ s writing, it is clear that the artifact had experienced massive erosion that was caused by the abrasive sea tides and the salty waters. The English Heritage had to fund the whole process as it was envisaged to be expensive. The third chapter focuses on the centers on the controversies that surrounded the excavation process the naming of the artifact. Watson reveals that from the onset, the excavation idea and activity were of low profile and had the privilege of being aired buy only the British Archeology Magazine and few Nolfork media outlets.

The scenario shifted after the story was aired by The Independent. the excavation was published on the top page of the magazine and was written by the papers environmental correspondent.  

Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
Contact Us