The paper "Advance Australia and Ban the Burqa" is a wonderful example of an assignment on sociology. This report contains: A standardization of the argument used in the “ Ban the Burqa” press release. An analysis of the weaknesses and strengths of the argument, as standardized. An analysis of the language and rhetoric used in the article “ Ban the Burqa. " Roy Morgan study and Advance Australia's use of it. The recommendation in response to the ‘ ’ Ban the Burqa’ ’ Conclusion: Ban of Burqa is a solution to the threat in Australia. Advance Australia suggests medieval customs should be forced to an end. 1.1 Immigrants’ culture should contribute to the freedoms and values in Australia 1.2 Burqa stops integration and diversity. 1.3 Recent polls show 81% of Australians is against wearing of Burqa in public. [Premises 1.1& 1.2 linked] The burqa is a threat as criminals use it as a tool of criminals. 2.1 Burqa guarantees the safety of anonymity and allows wrongdoing to go unchecked. 2.1.1 In Mainbrace, a report of robbery and assault at gunpoint by a thug wearing a burqa 2.1.2 Police have no hope of catching the criminals wearing Burqa 2.1.3Motorcyclists are not allowed to wear helmets in banks and petrol stations. 2.1.4Motorists hide from prosecution when they speed. [Premises 2.1.1& 2.1.2 Linked.
Premises 2.1.3& 2.1.4 linked] Equality of women is an essential value in Australia 3.1 Advance Australia claims Burqa represents repression domination of women. 3.2 Advance Australia states domination of women has no place in Australia 3.3 Liberal do-gooders suggest Burqa is a symbol of female repression. [Premises 3.1& 3.2 Linked] [Premises 1-4 Convergent] An Analysis of the Strong and Weak Points of the argument as standardized. Premise One The thinking behind premise 1 is that there are primitive cultures that exist in society. Advance Australia claim cultures in modern society do not bind with current values that promote growth and development in Australia.
The old world of immigrants’ cultures that do not match with Australian cultures and norms should not be recreated. Burqa brings a threat to Australia as insecurity and economic pull-down is experienced. It makes sense if these cultures bring negative effects to society. The burqa is a threat to security and 81% of Australians support the ban of this clothing in public places (Chesler 1). However, Australia is a multicultural country involving diverse cultures from different lands.
The burqa is a symbol of devoted faith in Islamic religions. It represents modesty and purity (Nussbaum 11). Women make choices if to wear or not. Denying burqa to a woman means that they are not capable of making their decision. This garment according to Muslim culture is not repression of women as Advance Australia statement suggests. The burqa is not the root of the problem. How some people in the country are using it in crimes is the problem (Bernardi 1).
Chesler, Phyllis. "Ban the Burqa? The argument in favor." Middle East Quarterly (2010). Web.
Bernardi, C. “For Australia’s sake, we need to ban the burqa”. The Age (2012). Web.
Nussbaum, M. “Veiled threats”. New York Times: (2010), 11. Web.
Kılıç, S., Saharso, S., & Sauer, B. “Introduction: the veil: debating citizenship, gender and religious diversity”. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 15(4), (2008): 397-410. Web.
Francis, S., Worthington, A., Mayhew, K., Brockie, J., EnhanceTV (Firm), & Screenrights (Society). (2010). Banning the burqa. Neutral Bay, N.S.W.: EnhanceTV. Web.
Grillo, R., & Shah, P. “Reasons to Ban? The Anti-Burqa Movement in Western Europe”. MMG Working Paper, (2012): 12-05. Web.
Eltahawy, M. Ban the Burqa. International Herald Tribune (2009). Web.