The paper “ Development of Mobile Application – Teamwork, Helpful Procedures and Software” is an intriguing example of an assignment on information technology. Team members were proactively selected on the basis of the skills required for the project. The personality of each was also carefully considered. The resultant team was comprised of individuals who were not only aware of their particular team roles but also understood what was anticipated in terms of their contribution to the project and the team. All team members exhibited an awareness of the significance of the roles within the team.
The awareness was evidenced by their excellent knowledge of the procedure used by the team in planning and tracking of not only the quality but also the timing of the required tasks. The team leader earned the respect of the team members because of always consulting with the team members prior to making crucial decisions. Parker (2011) stipulates that suitable team composition is vital for a team to be successful. The team members were committed to the team’ s success and shared project objectives as evidenced by their high level of motivation and engagement in the project.
Successful teams are engaged, inspired, and aspire to attain the highest level (Galegher, Kraut, & Egido 2014). They facilitated and cultivated positive, cooperative working relations founded on the focus of creating a quality end product that could impress the tutor, fellow students, and end-users. The entire team was motivated to aid other teams and shared a robust common objective of developing an app that could support their likelihood of gaining employment at the end of the course. A constructive interdependent team setting elicited the best in each player, thus enabling the team to attain their objectives at a superior level.
The members of the team showed that the project’ s success was based upon each team member’ s contribution. Team members were at all times happy to help fellow team members whenever they were experiencing any difficulty. The team proactively brainstormed difficulties that individuals in the team were experiencing and offered assistance where it was needed. The capability of working effectively with other members of the team fosters a caring work environment (Dunin-Keplicz & Verbrugge 2011). What did not work as a teamThe team members came up with many designs for the app.
Initially, each member of the team wanted their design to be adopted for the app. The debate about the app design to be used for the app resulted in personality differences among the members of the team. The team recognized that team members had dissimilar personalities that would result in problems at various stages of the project. They decided to express consideration for each other, esteem and support others in hard times. Team members are highly focused on delivering a superior product when they overlook personal issues (Goetsch & Davis 2014). In addition, there was difficulty in physically communicating some features in the app such as ‘ map current location’ .
The team members resolved to offer willingly and receive constructive criticism and provide genuine feedback. The team members recognized that it was to the best of the team’ s interest to discuss difficult issues and try to offer constructive criticism in an attempt to resolve them. They strongly valued open dialog that enabled them to express their concerns in a non-defensive manner.
Valuing team members’ contributions and articulating it aids to create successful work surroundings (Spitzberg & Cupach 2011).