Nike: Sweatshop Debate - Assignment Example

Nike pays better remuneration to its employees in Asian countries compared to local employers and employees are undoubtedly happy about this. Should the company be held accountable and quit doing business in such countries, employees in these foreign facilities would be rendered jobless and plunge deep into penury.No, Nike should not be in any way criticized for low pay in Indonesia. Presenting the facts, approximately half the Indonesian population earns less than $1 per day. On the other hand, Nike pays its Indonesian employees a minimum of $2.28. Simple arithmetic projects that Nike pays more than double what most Indonesians earn per day from other sources.

Why then would the company be criticized for low pay? Clearly, Nike should not be blamed for the low pay for its Indonesian subcontractors.Nike does not need to change its policies. The company’s main focus is to maximize shareholders’ value and ensure its continuity in a competitive marketplace. As such, adopting policies that focus on the welfare of workers at the expense of the financial health of the company would do Nike no good.Sweatshops do more good than harm around the globe.