Is Politics Inevitable - Assignment Example

Politics and Inevitability Introduction According to Obama in his article about the sound of inevitability, the inevitability arises from the necessity or inability like roaring of lions. Inevitability can be observed in social world regarding politics, hierarchies and display of status. The understanding of inevitability on intellectual basis will solve the mysteries of social world. The reason for involvement of alcohol can be understood by understanding the inevitability intellectually. This makes us to understand the insanity of the show. In some parties the sound of inevitability will not be heard but the favours can be paid back. The strangeness in the human beings is not even observed in animals, as they are dangerous machines. When we consider politics inevitability will be a greatest weapon. Hillary Clinton’s seeking of democratic presidential nomination is showing up her immense strengths. This is inevitable in spite of the fact that she may not follow a truly appalling predecessor, but one can argue that the presidential elections will be open then ever. The process may be frontloaded, but the formidable political assault course of fundraising and primaries to overcome the opponents can hand a nomination from one of the two major parties. The chilling and ridiculous coverage of the Virginia Tech massacre was interesting but many thought about the causes like gun control laws but forgotten the fundamental things that made the massacre happen. This can be one of the reasons of the inevitability. The absence of the thought of not using the weapon and the system that makes that atmosphere a reality may be one of the inevitability of politics in any human society. The evil being a palliative also may be one of the reasons for the inevitability of the politics. The thinking of nonsensical categories like good and evil will make emotivists right. The definition of evil as the one we don’t like and the good as the one we like it is the reason for the inevitability. 1. Best For The Man According to Auden’s gloss on Sophocles’ sentiment, it will be best if the man will not take birth. Once the birth takes place, have to enjoy it. When an election comes after a two term of a president, the candidates will be termed as the second draw candidates till the results are open. According to Joel Silbey, the civil war is harsh than the battlefield. This is because the confusion it involves. The end of the slavery after the civil war was inevitability and this can be termed as a result of politics on the name of slavery. After the civil war and the politics it involved USA has turned into a complete nation rather than an association of states. The policy disagreements will influence the happenings of politics and the course of collision. The course of collision will determine the ultimate plan of action and this involves the politics. The purpose of the war will decide the direction of the politics. The political deftness is capable of avoiding the war but the military skill is part of the politics. The insider’s intelligence according to Safire can be honed by activity of politicians. The strongest voice among the politicians will survive and this comes from tough minded and quick-witted. This attracts the people and makes the political activities a success. The political realism and good sense the contrast lays in lack of restraint by politicians that makes politics continuity an inevitability. This is because the Democratic set up of government itself needs the politics to be done. The understanding of the democracy and the politics will make any political leader will reduce the possibility of war and collision. The responding of the opponents according to the needs will reduce the collision course in the politics. The historical realities are capable of making the politics inevitable. 2. Obeying the Laws and Democracy The grounds to obey the laws in the democratic state are a reason for the course of politics. The compulsory nature of the state and the people who find it difficult will be a cause for the politics. The punishments for not obeying the laws will increase the intensity of the political activities. As the politics and Democracy are synonymous in western society, the putting forward the main reason for obeying the laws and making them democratically will be the main reason for reducing or increasing the political activities. The democracy can provide right setting for political obligation when the system makes the laws under which we live. They should be in the interests of the majority of the people and the reducing of the political activities can be achieved by benefiting the majority of the people. The vested interests that benefit the small section of the people will increase the intensity of political activities and lead to anarchy and dictatorships. All such laws give rise to some obligations, which are: On what grounds should we obey the laws of the state? Crucial because of the compulsory nature of the state – cannot easily opt out If we do not obey we can be punished Politics’ and ‘Democracy’ synonymous in western society Why is it regarded as indispensable? Democracy put forward as the main reason for obeying rules and laws Because laws are democratically made In any democracy, following are the possibilities: 1. That all should govern, in the sense that all should be involved in legislating, in deciding on general policy, in applying laws and in governmental administration 2. That all should be personally involved in crucial decision making, that is to say in deciding general laws and matters of general policy 2. That all should be personally involved in crucial decision making, that is to say in deciding general laws and matters of general policy 4. That rulers should be accountable to the ruled and be removed by the ruled 5. That rulers should be chosen by the ruled 6. That rulers should be chosen by representatives of the ruled 7. That rulers should act in the interests of the ruled All such possibilities have given rise to some contemporary debates, which are: Elitist v Classical Elitist: ‘revisionist’ or ‘protective’ democracy Post 1945 Joseph Schumpeter (1883-1950) Politics to a class of political elites Impossible for all to participate (‘classical’) Elitist v Classical Classical (developmental): Democracy as end in itself - enriching Virtue and intelligence 1960s scholars – ‘lost the true meaning’ Accompanied by rise in student protests Of these, the key points are as below: Elitist model: If democracy is political equality then it is stretched to its limits Classical/developmental: That apathy can be overcome That participation can be achieved Whenever there is democracy, the inevitability of politics is certain, and that exerts some degree of its constraints on freedom. Various possible constraints on our freedom: democracy political coercion physical incapacity rationality and morality psychology economic impediments Furthermore, democracy could limit freedom in a number of ways: Majority decision-making? ‘The general will’ Moral freedom, i.e. abortion The lack or abundance of freedom can further be taken into domains as negative and positive freedom, which can be denoted by the following pyramid: Area of control = negative Source of control = positive Needs self-government Berlin wanted to defend negative freedom Violently opposed to positive freedom Saw it as enemy of real freedom Argued that self government involves view that genuine freedom requires the real, ‘rational’ self over the ‘actual’ self. *** Read More