Student P number: Module: Module code: Submission deadline: Aims Questions and/or HypothesisThe study aimed at exploring the experiences of positive adjustments among 12 people that have a range of viable differences. The thematic analysis was relevant as they covered themes of growth, importance of appearance, coping and relationships with others. However, including background study of the individuals would also have been relevant. It would have looked to provide an in depth analysis as one follows in the footsteps of the individuals under this research study (Ayers 2007). As much as change is inevitable, it might be hard to neither determine nor acknowledge.
The focus of this study on investigating positive experiences the adjustment to ‘re-living with a difference that is visible. Research questions covered were on the positive consequences of living with these differences, they considered positive, why and the contributing factors to this positive experience. Rationale and Justification of the StudyIdeally, the rationale of the research is detachable. As stated in the introduction, the research was mostly based of the experience of people who have reported having problems. The research leaned toward the individuals who have stated having problems on both negative outcomes and social situations.
Additionally there was a failure when identifying available quantitative measures used in assessment of positive outcomes. On the plus side, there has been little research about positive outcomes and resilience among individuals with a visible difference. Most previous research I came across majored on individual disfiguring conditions. As assumed that the challenges faced by individuals with visible differences are alike (Marinell & Dell-orto 1984). This was irrespective of the cause or disfigurement they suffered. Since the challenges facing people who have a visible difference are typically similar, regardless of the type or cause of disfigurement, this qualitative study has explored the issues of resilience and positive outcomes among a group of individuals with a range of visible differences.
This study also explores positive outcomes and pliability among a group of individuals with an array of visible differences. Note that persons with a higher pliability rate tend to employ positive emotions. Additionally, an individual can speculate, hence; people who display characteristics of poor adaptation in relation to their visible differences are mostly low in pliability and tend to display emotions that are more negative.
Some individuals under the study indicated that they handled or rather took each day as it came. These individuals accepted all negative impacts and deemed the impacts as a livelihood that one has to encounter occasionally. They believed this to be a way of channeling emotions out as opposed to building them up (Marinell & Dell-orto 1984). Some research states that sense of humor is among the effective strategy to copping with the disfigurement. It is applicable as a destruction technique and a responsive way to any challenging remarks toward their appearance.
Sarcasm, self-deprecation, and understatement are also effective copping strategies. ClarityFundamentally, the problem statement was clearly defined with the research pointing out on areas that are omitted in most research. The study emphasizes that having any form of visible difference does not necessarily imply that one is bond to have negative experiences. Furthermore, the study indicates that some heath experts need to diversify their awareness of the existing sources of difference. There was rich data produced from the group interviews.
The data played vital roles on the benefaction form the interviews’ interactions with one another.