The paper “ Pugs at Work - Bodily Capital and Bodily Labour among Professional Boxers by Wacquant” is a worthy variant of an article on sociology. The article discusses the relationship between the physique of a pugilist and the social interaction associated with the performance of the boxer. The article compares and contrasts between pugilist social behavior, their training involvement, and the field performance to identify how each practice influences the other; either directly or indirectly. The author mainly wants to bring out the paradox that exists between the so-called bodily capital and bodily labor.
The paradox is that while some people view pugilism as a bodily capital in which boxers are the sole proprietors, others view it from the perspective of bodily labor in which boxers have to train hard in order to gain. Though sociology of body has not expounded on these, it is clear that for one to be a pro he must be trained with vigor and be inborn culpable (Wacquant 1995, pp. 66). Perspective or approach is taken to address the problem In this research, the author has applied the qualitative research approach in collecting the information he needs.
He applied the ethnographic inquiry kind of study design, which includes; purposeful sampling, prolonged engagement, recursive interpretation, multiple source data collections, triangulation of data sources such as training style, the training involvement, the level of the training, etc. the research method is reliable since it is based on the evidence from the sources of the information. From the article, the sources include; pugilist themselves who are also the trainees, the trainer also the coaches. The research is also based on the researcher’ s knowledge because as the author put it he was also a boxer.
This kind of research method is cooperative learning literature in which all the participants are involved to come up with the required information. The kind of data collected by the author includes general information about the pugilist, their interaction with the other trainee and competitors as well as their coaches (Kothari 1985, pp. 120). On the same point, the author has the boxer’ s general information such as their heights, weights, physique, age, neck size, fore aim length, etc.
in addition, the author uses other information from a magazine which features the pugilist’ s performance, power, stamina, and other physical attributes as well as the ability for the pugilist to knock his opponent down. The information is analyses in a discussion forum in which the author discusses the results from the data collected from the participant and other sources. The author discusses that, as must as the pugilist body be viewed as bodily labor, the data suggests otherwise. The information indicates that the performance of pugilists is influenced by the involvement of the boxer with other social activities as well the diet not forgetting that everybody is created with the limit points.
From the finding, body performance is subject to flexibility which unlike other machines, human flexibility is determined by more than one aspect of life. These determinants include physiological, sociological, psychological, and other inborn characteristics and attributes of a human being. In that respect, the gym room is a social place for rebuilding a pugilist to be fighting machines.
Dawson, Catherine, 2002, Practical Research Methods, New Delhi: UBS Publishers’ Distributors,
Kothari, C.R., 1985, Research Methodology-Methods and Techniques, New Delhi: Wiley Eastern Limited.
Messner, M. 1990. ‘When Bodies Are Weapons: Masculinity and Violence in Sport’. International Review for the Sociology of Sport. Vol. 25(3): 203-220
O’Neil, J.1985.Five Bodies: The Human Shape of Modern Society. Ithaca: University Press.
Sammons, J. 1998, Beyond the Ring: The Role of Boxing in American Society. Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
Wacquant, L. 1995, pugs at work: bodily capital and bodily labor among professional boxers. Body & Society.vol.1; pp. 65-93