The Issue of Suicide in The Wrongfulness of Euthanasia by J. Gay Williams – Article Example

Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing

The paper "The Issue of Suicide in The Wrongfulness of Euthanasia by J. Gay Williams" is a delightful example of an article on sociology. In the article: “ The Wrongfulness of Euthanasia” , J. Gay Williams (1979) tries to persuade the target audience to the belief that assisted suicide is wrong. The reasons were given by J. Gay Willaims’ s include that euthanasia contravenes nature in that it violates the natural goal of survival. Euthanasia causes persuasion of courses other than personal interests, and it deprives the victims of the benefits associated with contemporary medicine.

The standardization for the arguments can be presented as follows: Benevolence cultivates the acceptance of euthanasia, which is presented as an easy way of ending human suffering Euthanasia conceptual approach that violates the naturally selected goal of survival Errors in contemporary medicine can falsify a condition making the victim wrongfully believe they cannot improve or heal Euthanasia has a corrupting power: health professionals and patients seeking quick and easy solutions to suffering Analysis of “ The Wrongfulness of Euthanasia” (Williams 1979) Introduction The term euthanasia has gained unparalleled importance in the contemporary medical realm. The concept has also instigated the emergence of different schools of thoughts as professionals and the public alike continually debating its legitimacy: moral and legal validity. J Gay Williams expressly denounced the legitimacy of euthanasia referring to it as a wrongful act of killing.

There is seemingly universal acceptance of euthanasia within the contemporary society; however, its underlying ideology and practice receive condemnation from sections of the community that detest underpinning justifications for willful termination of human life. According to Williams (1979), benevolence cultivates the acceptance of euthanasia, which is presented as an easy way of ending human suffering particularly in under conditions in which recovery from a chronic ailment or injury becomes practicably impossible.

The logic underpinning the increasing acceptance of euthanasia within the society extracts from the human perception that people are better dead than living with life-long pain and that killing them does not amount to illegality (White 2008). Williams (1979) authoritatively disputed the agreeability of euthanasia, expressly terming the concept wrongful. For the purpose of this analysis, the definition of euthanasia given by Williams (1979) is withheld. The definition is anchored on three crucial elements, which view euthanasia as involving the taking of human life, the life involved must be faced with a life-long threat, and the action of taking the life must be voluntary and intentional (White 2008). Euthanasia is executed for various reasons some of which may be outside the individual’ s own comfort but for the benefit of relatives or caregivers.  


Cholbi, M 2011, Suicide: the philosophical dimensions, Broadview Press, London, UK.

Taylor, H 2005, ‘Majorities of U.S. adults favor euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide by more than two-to-one’, The Harris Poll, 32.

Weir, RF 1997, Physician-assisted suicide, Indiana University Press, Indiana, IN.

White, JE 2008, Contemporary moral problems, 9th edn. Cengage Learning, London, UK.

Williams, JG 1979, ‘the wrongfulness of euthanasia’ In Ronald Munson (ed) 1996, Intervention and reflection: basic issues in medical ethics, 5th edn. Wadsworth, pp. 168-171.

Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
Contact Us