Critical Discourse Analysis: March in March: Two Sides to the Story We Didn't Run by J. Maley – Article Example

Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing

The paper "Critical Discourse Analysis: March in March: Two Sides to the Story We Didn't Run by J. Maley" is a wonderful example of an article on social science. The article is written by Jacqueline Maley who is the Parliamentary Sketch Writer for The Sydney Morning Herald and an established journalist. The Sydney Morning Herald is a popular newspaper and is credited with high standards of journalism. Basically, the perspective of the readers is that the regular opinion columns are written after conducting thorough research, the details are valid and integrity is upheld.

Opinion columns from such a reputable newspaper are expected to uphold high standards of journalism, have strong and details that give richness to a story. The second paragraph should have been the first paragraph because it is the lead of the news story: The second paragraph with the catchline ''Dear Sydney Morning Herald re March in March'' provides a clear and concise overview of the key points and thus conveys to the readers what they will be learning regarding the piece (Carter, 2014). Allegory The piece uses allegory to illustrate the ideas and concepts so that the readers can easily digest the story.

According to George (2008) allegory conveys its message using symbolic figures, actions, imagery or even events rather than directly using words. Examples of allegory commonly used as form of representation include literary, visual, or musical art. In this piece, a photograph and artwork have been used to represent the anti-Tony Abbott protests. Just by the reader looking at the photograph and the artwork showing people matching, the reader will most definitely have an idea regarding the story (George, 2008). According to Fairclough’ s theory, language is used to talk about politics in Australia.

On the other hand, Foucault’ s theory has been applied in the article in analyzing the alleged bias of Herald. Framing Text Good side vs. bad side Focused Protests vs. Unfocused Protests Proper language vs. improper language The title text “ Two sides to the story we didn't run” has been used to influence the reader regarding the content that the piece will talk about. On reading the title “ Two sides to the story we didn't run” , the reader will obviously form a mental picture that there was no bias as to why the story was not run since there two balancing reasons why the story was not run! “ The lack of coverage of March in March probably… .

it was unfocused” . This text influences the reader to have an opinion that Herald did not error in not covering the story but the reason why the protest was not covered is that the protest was unfocused. Additionally, the article gives many reasons as to why Herald should not be blamed for not covering March in March protest. For example, the group that organized the protests really despises Main Stream Media and hence there is no reason they should complain if they are not covered by the same media they despise.

Again, during the protest, the dirty language was used even in the placard. This included using extremely vulgar language to describe the prime minister. Obviously, such reasons might influence and give the reader a perspective that there were good reasons as to why the March in March protests were not covered (Druckman, 2001).

Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
Contact Us