The paper "Lingering Debates and Innovative Advances: The State of Public Opinion Research by Kevin J. Mullinix" is a delightful example of an article on politics. This paper will critically review the article, Lingering Debates and Innovative Advances: The state of Public Opinion Research authored by Kevin J. Mullinix published by the University of Kansas. The author claims the explicit understanding of the distinguished public opinion and its impact on public policy, which has to lead to substantive contributions over the years is mainly attributed to a set of numerous facets that are instrumental in the formation of opinions. Context For the past decade, tremendous advances have been in defining public opinion.
Although seemingly a tough subject matter to analyze given the various facets which constitute it. Nevertheless, the difficulty of the subject does no impede further exploration to establish a better that can be applied in real-life scenarios. In actual fact, public policy researchers must acknowledge the multifaceted nature of public opinion and its advances. This particular article features the laudable, landmark frames and selective information exposure by the media, which are instrumental in motivated reasoning among other aspects of opinion formation that entail, information processing, issue definition and interpretation.
The in-depth examination of public opinion literature in this particular paper gives insight into the recent advances as well as innovations ingenious in the way of conducting research, especially classic theories utilized in race politics and immigration (Mullinix, 2011). The irrefutable account of theories and subjective facets that influence the formation of public opinion is entirely suitable in the field of public policy as well as public opinion, which are extensively applicable in other disciplines such as policy formation and agenda-setting.
In addition, the literature explored wherein media studies are explored could serve an apposite role in the comprehension of mechanisms through which, people interpret policy and utilize bias in their opinion pertaining to policies. Therefore, policy researchers can benefit from this information to understand policy-related information and filter motive-laden biases. In essence, the framing of facets leading to the formation of opinions has extensive effects in a diverse competitive environment. It is believed that a particular debate or conflict definition of alternatives is instrumental in public opinion.
Analysts have cited framing effects for a vast number of issues in diverse political contexts. However, the account of framing effects in voluminous literature is not cognizant of the aspect of the environment in which, rival sides promote a particular way of framing issues and their interpretation. Thus, it is crucial to subject analysis of public opinion to their distinct environments wherein framing effects render them biased towards a particular angle of view.
Chong, Denis James N. Druckman. “Framing Public Opinion in Competitive Democracies”
American Political Science Review Vol. 101, No. 4 November 2007 DOI: 10.1017/S0003055407070554
Mullinix, Kevin J. “Lingering Debates and Innovative Advances: The State of Public Opinion Research Policy”. Studies Journal; Apr 2011; 39, S1; ProQuest pg. 61
William G. Jacoby. “Issue Framing and Public Opinion on Government Spending
American.” Journal of Political Science. Vol. 44, No. 4 (Oct., 2000), pp. 750-767