The paper "Urban Institute in Forty Years of Social Policy and Policy Research by Robert Solow" is a great example of an article on social science. In his article “ Forty Years of Social Policy and Policy Research” , Robert Solow claims that social and economic policies and policy research are inextricably linked. There is the only way to evaluate social programs which are activated now or then. That way is policy research because it helps to find out for real and in a very serious way that what policy is actually effective and what policy pretends to be plausible.
There has to be a reason behind every policy implemented and the benefit of experimental testing is that it helps to scrutinize the extent to which a policy or a program could be held valid or reliable. Extraneous factors inflict a detrimental effect on policy outcomes. So, experiments set out to assess the nature of such outcomes by isolating them from extraneous influences. The article further enumerates that the Urban Institute, which was designed to carry out economic and social policy research and evaluate myriad programs, now has to deal with a bigger area of more intricate assignments.
The search for real understanding has generated a bigger body of research work. Another main point of Solow’ s article is that social policies should not be sold as cures for social problems, rather they should seek to reduce the incidence of bothering factors. When this does not happen, small statistical differences result. Small statistical differences translate into little change which leads inevitably leads to a feeling of letdown. Any important claim made by Solow is that many social and economic pathologies like crime and poor housing are in part born by the laws of economics.
These laws promote impractical outcomes about popular policies, but when the result is not as expected, public disappointment is inevitable. Reading Solow’ s article helped me in getting familiar with the depths of social and economic research. It helped me to understand why it is actually the economic laws themselves which are in part to be blamed for the continual social and economic problems. These laws are designed to put an end to all nagging problems, but they only turn out to foment them.
I also agree with the part of Solow’ s article that the outcomes of any program are excessively promoted by the government. They are presented to the public as something very attractive or lucrative, but the actual results turn out to be a far cry from the promises made at the start. This leads to mixed feelings of resentment and disappointment in the public. I agree with Solow that every policy should seek to lower the incidence of the problematic issue instead of promising to eliminate it from the face of the earth.
Such promises are impractical and have no significance. Solow is absolutely right when he claims that valuable limited resources, lots of manpower, and billions of dollars should not be invested in ineffective government ideas, no matter how plausible and tempting the program outcomes or promises may appear to be. Social research should be unbiased and it should be able to diagnose even the minutest differences made in society.