This paper "Before The Claims of Crispr Babies, There Was China’ s One-Child Policy" is a good example of an article on sociology. After the news of the famous one-child policy in China had finally sunk in, news of crisp babies started to emerge, fueling the efforts of Mei Fong to write this article about the discovery of crisp babies, a technology engineered by one Dr He Jiankui, a Chinese scientist who resides in Shenzhen. In her article, Mei explains how the Chinese government had restricted Chinese couples from siring more than one child in a bid to control overpopulation in the country.
She further goes on to state how people with mental and physical disabilities were restricted from giving birth with selective abortions being carried out in favour of the male gender. It was in this era that Dr He was born. He expressed his dissatisfaction in the one-child policy and that was when he began the crisp babies’ project so that he could help in creating babies that would be saved from sterilization. In his defence, the doctor said, “ There is someone somewhere doing this.
If it’ s not me, it’ s someone else. ” In her article, Mei states that even before the inception of the crisp project, designer babies had been a common practice for the Chinese and especially those that hailed from rich families. She also noted that rich citizens from other nations embraced designer babies but Chinese are always leading in donor eggs purchases. Inclusive in her article, are statements made by Wendie Wilson-Miller, a person who manages an egg donor agency located in South Carolina saying that the clients from Chinese sought "taller donors and they seek to know whether they have undergone any eyelid surgery. " A recent poll conducted in China had shown that crisp babies were highly embraced amidst criticism shown towards Dr He.
As she winds up on her article, Mei states that no one knew so much about crisp babies but it was an emerging trend that other scientists would soon attempt to generate babies that are stronger, smarter and more good looking. From my point of view, if a parent seeks to have their child’ s DNA changed in favour of the future interests of the child then I totally agree on the crisp project.
Advocating for such projects in various nations to be denied the relevant permits should be discouraged and instead encourage the safety and effectiveness during the implementation of such a procedure to hinder the scientists from crossing ethical lines and endangering human lives or creating babies with more problems. We can all agree that it would be unfair to go through all the relevant steps just to come up with a baby who shall be frequently seeking medical attention.
As a matter of fact, it would be a wise move if a specific group of trusted scientists would be mandated with this task to avoid potential mistakes by people who are only after recognition and monetary gain. One of my greatest concern, however, is the social impact the crisp scientific development would bring to a community. If my memory serves me well, I recall this one time my friends and I visited a facility for children with various disorders. I could tell that the kind of life they lived was full hardships because they had to depend on other people in order to complete almost every activity they needed to do.
And now I can't help but think how, despite this technology being potentially beneficial in reducing the number of individuals suffering from a specific genetic disorder, it could contribute to further marginalization of the people who already have the disorder and therefore, leaving them with the limited medical provision. Winding up, it is important to understand that change is inevitable.
We live in a world where technologies are rapidly emerging and we have no choice but to accept the change. Crispy babies’ technology will undoubtedly go a long way in ensuring that future generations are relieved of some genetic disorders. On the other hand, this technology needs to be handled carefully to avoid the chances of any negative impacts on society and the crossing of ethical lines to violate human rights.