The paper "Six Writers in Search of Texts: a Protocol-Based Investigation of L1 and L2 Writing by V Arndt " is a perfect example of an article on education. Outline This paper details the findings of an empirical case study conducted by Valerie Arndt in China generalized among six postgraduate EFL students. The study’ s main aim was to establish whether there are differences between the characteristics of EFL students in their writing processes based on the process they used to compose written texts and the texts they composed. The article thus analyzed helps critic the findings of the study, a contextualization of these findings to the contemporary body of knowledge in researching writing for ESL and EFL purposes while also highlighting some weaknesses and strengths of the study in question.
To do this, the following structure has been used: Introduction The paper begins with an introduction, which illustrates the relevance, scope, and context of the paper and the central thesis of exploration. The paper structure is also stated in the introduction. Overview of the Study In this section, the paper gives an overview of the text of analysis and illustrates what the main points the author of the article who is also the researcher, has written about.
The overview introduces the general treatment the research study accorded writing research for ESL and EFL purposes Theoretical Consensus on Writing Research Inspiring the Study This section aims at contextualizing what previous research studies had found and concentrated on prior to Arndt’ s research and what her findings could validate, modify, negate, or expand on. Major Findings of the Study In this section, the paper highlights some of the major findings published in the text on accord of the writing research it documents and explains the significance of these findings in the context of other publications from the available body of knowledge on writing research. The Strengths of the Study In this section, the paper details the strengths of the study on whose findings the text of analysis has been published and why the research has relevantly added to the available body of knowledge on researching writing skills, methodologies, and teaching in ESL/EFL settings.
Arndt, V. (1987). Six writers in search of texts: a protocol-based study of L1 and L2 writing. ELT Journal 41(4): 257-267.
Bosher, S. (1998). The composing processes of three Southeast Asian writers at the post-secondary level: an exploratory study. Journal of Second Language Writing. Vol. 7(2), pp. 205-241.
Britton, J.et al. (1975). The Development of Writing Abilities. London: Macmillan Education.
Hayes, J.R. & Flower, L.S. (1983). Uncovering cognitive processes in writing: an introduction to protocol analysis. In P. Mosenthal, L. Tamor, and S.A. Walmsley (eds.), Research On Writing: Principles and Methods. New York: Longman, pp.207-220.
Ludwig, O. (1983). ‘Writing systems and written language’ in F. Coulmas and K. Ehlich (eds.): Writing in Focus, Trends in Linguistics Studies and Monographs 24. Berlin: Mouton.
Martlew, M. (1983). ‘Problems and difficulties: cognitive and communicative aspects of writing' in M.Martlew (ed.). The Psychology of Written Language: Developmental and Educational Perspectives. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.
Nisbett, R.E. & Wilson, T.D. (1977). Telling more than we can know: verbal reports on mental process. Psychology Review. Vol. 84, pp. 231-159.
Nystrand, M. (ed.). (1982). What Writers Know: the Language, Process and Structure of Written Discourse. New York: Academic Press.
Perl, S. (1981). 'Coding the Composing Process: a Guide for Teachers and Researchers.' MS written for the National Institute of Education, Washington, D.C.
Prior, P. (2004). Tracing process: how texts come into being. In C. Bazerman & P. Prior (eds.), What Writing Does and How It Does It. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 167-200.
Rose, M. (1980). Rigid rules, inflexible plans, and the stifling of language: a cognitivist analysis of writer's block. College Composition and Communication. Vol. 31 (4). pp. 389-401.
Stratman, J.F. & Hamp-Lyons, L. (1994). Reactivity in concurrent think-aloud protocols: issues for research. In P. Smagorinsky (ed.), Speaking About Writing: Reflections on Research Methodology. Thousand Oaks: Sage, pp.89-112.
Smagorinsky, P. (1989). The reliability and validity of protocol analysis. Written Communication. Vol. 6(4), pp. 463-479.