The importance of Rossi work to understanding the city - Essay Example

The Importance of Rossi Work to Understanding the Rossi believes that the process of construction cannot be separated in value to time. From the time that construction process started, civilization triggered mankind to building surroundings that are favorable. Over the years, these buildings have changed themselves which has led to overlapping the subject matter of its own development that has made their existence to be different over time. This may make less the value of this evolution. The fact that a region has the quality of being singular in the city is what that makes them a point solus.

It is the responsibility of the city to look after these manmade features. The development of a city in relation to these manmade features is what makes up the city’s nature and morphology and from this reference Rossi is able to define urbanism.The city’s nature can be examined using massive structures, engineering works, and structures that are characteristic to their own history. Failure of connecting these two shows the sophisticated reality that has to be addressed for the future of the city.

The history is the very important for the city’s development. Its favorable character and good moments of life, is very necessary in the city life. The man made features is work of art while the city is viewed as a human achievement and these achievements have the biggest contribution for the overall individuality of the city. Rossi believes that only the historian can give the complete picture of a city because they are the only ones who are totally concerned with defining the urban manmade features and their gradual development in different eras.

History provides to urban science making it very important. This statement is related to the theory of remaining unchanged. The city is an object that is manmade and we will always feel the past and it will give meaning to the state of being permanent. This permanence can be felt in nature’s existence and the way towards which the city is headed. Rossi defines urban manmade features as the main elements because they have provided for the cultural and morphological of the city’s evolution.

A good example is the changing of the amphitheatre at Nimes was changed in a fortress to become a little functional city of inhabitants of around two thousand. Outside the wall, it grew with a shape of amphitheatre as the main element.A city is a collection of the memory of those who belong there and the same with memory, it has to be associated with places and objects. It is a point of memories that are collected. Locus and citizenry relationship transformed to the city’s present image. History that is great shapes its future.

A good example; the Sabines and Latins stayed near the valley. The main city was created by tribes that were scattered everywhere in the hills. A century forum that was the fifth one stopped being a trading center and transformed to become a worshiping area. The dynamics of the manmade features played very crucial part in the creation of the space. In his effort to develop gradually the city with the view of urban artifacts, Rossi convincingly proposed his theory. He integrated the hypothetical idea with social-economic, political giving Athens as an example; its existence theoretical base.

The city’s architecture is just the physical indicator of in man’s biography, involved more than the meanings and the beliefs that we recognize it with.