The paper "Transportation Planning Policy" is a good example of an annotated bibliography on politics. Report 1: Docherty, I., Shaw, J., & Gray, D. (2007). Transport Strategy in Scotland Since Devolution. Public Money and Management, 27 (2). Pp. 141-148. The article named above reviews the approach taken by the Scotland Executive in the transport sector since devolution. It critically reviews and tracks the progress and challenges the executive has encountered in developing transport infrastructure. The article takes note of commendable progress. It also gives the executive an equal share of criticism regarding congruence between development and an economic strategy and the actualization of these through policy-decisions.
It identifies a disconnect between the two. Additionally, it explores the impact of the new transport policy. However, this is not until the authors discuss the importance of project appraisal. The article’ s main aim is to appraise the executive’ s approach to nation-wide transport, examining policy-decision making. This is by analyzing the current transport policies. Additionally, it aims at contributing to works and literature on transport and devolution in the UK. The article does this by taking a comparative approach in which literature is reviewed.
In the literature review, the authors explore transport policy development in the context of financial implications. They also explore the relationship between strategy and policy decisions. The results indicate that the current transport policies may not be sustainable. The government has been running transport industry incentives that are socially inclusive, but economically inhibitive for the majority of the economically active, with respect to accessibility. There is also a disconnect between the government's intended economic strategies and policy decisions. The lack of congruence between these is responsible for Scotland’ s lagging in transport infrastructure relative to peers. It is important for Scotland’ s executive to reconcile the transport infrastructure strategy with project investment decisions.
This is linking strategic plans with actualization policies that are implemented. Regardless of the global size of the budget, transport investment effect on an economy is dependent on infrastructural decisions and implementation. There is a need in the country for the executive to establish concrete solution strategies given that the disconnect results from the effect of conflicting dissimilar policy statements. It is paradoxical that these statements are all intended at stimulating economic yet they conflict at implementation. Article critique The general overview of the article presents concepts and argumentative results in a flow.
There is a general natural progression of well-presented facts. Firstly, the title of the article is succinct and precise. It captures the content of the article in a few words “ Transport Strategy in Scotland since Devolution” . A critical review of the content reveals congruence with the article’ s objective to analyze transport strategy since devolution. However, the authors may have indicated the context of this analysis in the title.
The analysis of transport is in the context of an executive approach. Although the addition of the sense of the executive would make it longer than it is, this may give readers a relatively more straight-forward grasp of the intentions of the article. The introduction of the article finds strength in the abstract and an argumentative approach. The abstract delineates the general overview of the article. It makes up for the context of the executive by indicating the main objective of the article and the context.
Commission for Integrated Transport (2001), European Best Practice in Delivering Integrated Transport: Key Findings (London).
Docherty, I., Shaw, J., & Gray, D. (2007). Transport Strategy in Scotland Since Devolution. Public Money and Management, 27 (2). pp. 141-148.