Vervet Monkey – Annotated Bibliography Example

Annotated bibliography: Vervet Monkey Balmford A., Gaston K. J., Rodrigues A. S. L. & James A. (2000). Integrating costs of conservation into international priority setting. Conservation Biology, 14, 3, 597-605.
This text talks about how the wild animals can be tamed and protected, whereby there is a special mention of the vervet monkey and how the cost of their conservation can be integrated into the international setting of priorities. The authors suggest how their protection or conservation can be done without feeling or considering it as a burden.
Boulton A. M., Horrocks J. A. & Baulu J. (1996). The Barbados vervet monkey (Cercopithecus aethiops sabaeus): Changes in population size and crop damage, 1980-94. International Journal of Primatology, 17, 5.
In this article, the writers describe the vervet monkey in detain, which include the explanation of its characteristics and adaptation for its survival. The text also describes how its population changes; that is what leads to the changes in its population, and how it causes damages to the crops.
Brennan E. J., Else J. G. & Altmann J. (1989). Ecology and behaviour of a pest primate: Vervet monkeys in a tourist-lodge habitat. African Journal of Ecology, 23, 35-44.
This a report of a study that was carried out on the ecology and behavior of vervet monkeys that live near a tourist lodge during the peak season of tourists in a Kenyan national part called Amboseli. According to the report, it was found that the monkeys that live near the lodges appear in higher population densities, fed on the food that was availed to them by humans, and showed greater intergroup aggression.
Butynski, T. M. (2002). An Overview of Diversity and Taxonomy. In: M. E. Glenn and M. Cords (eds), Diversity and Adaptation in African Monkeys, pp. 3-13. Kluwer Academic / Plenum Publishers, New York, Boston, Dordrecht, London, Moscow.
In this text, the writer talks about the possible threats to the vertvet monkeys whereby he cites the continuing loss of habitat and degradation as the major source. Butynski asserts that the forests where the species live are under danger from the increasing populations of human beings, fire, agricultural activities, as well as the removal of products of forests like lumber, fuel wood and bamboo.
Cardini A. & Elton S. (2008). Variation in guenon skulls (I): Species divergence, ecological and genetic differences. Journal of Human Evolution, 54, 615-637.
This is a peer-reviewed article that melds the facts regarding organic diversity with the process of evolution’s continuity. The volumes that the writer presents in this series shows the methodological approaches and theoretical conceptions’ diversity that are presently being used by the physical anthropologists and primatologists. The author makes a special coverage of the behavior of primates in the captive settings and natural habitats; the primate conservation and ecology; the primates’ developmental biology; systematic of primates; phenotypic and genetic distinctions between the living primates and paleoprimatology.
Poirier FE. (1988). The St. Kitts green monkey (Cercopithecus aethiops sabaeus): ecology, population dynamics, and selected behavioral traits. Folia Primatol, 17: 20-55.
This article reports on the study of the social behavior and ecology of the different monkey species that was conducted for a total of seventy seven days and one hundred and twenty eight hours during the summers of the years 199 and 1970. There was also the inclusion of the locomotor patterns, diet, the everyday behavior as well as territorial behavior. The considerable variations within different species were noted. There are also suggestions for a course of research in future.
Cheney D. L. & Seyfarth R. M. (1988). Selective forces affecting the predator alarm calls of vervet monkeys. Behaviour, 76, 1, 25-61.
This is a report on the research that was conducted to determine the alarm calling rates among the high-ranking and low-ranking male and female vervet monkeys. According to the report, the researchers found out that the high-ranking female and male vervet monkeys alarm-call at a very higher frequencies as compared to the low-ranking females and males.
Cheney D. L. & Seyfarth R. M. (1987). How vervet monkeys perceive their grunts: Field playback experiments. Animal Behaviour, 30, 3, 739-751.
This article reports on an experiment that was conducted to find out the perception of vervet monkeys of their grunts. According to the report, the researchers found that the free-ranging vervet monkeys grunt to one another in various or different social situations; such when moving close to a surbidinate or dominant individual, when they are moving from one region to another of their range, or even when seeing another group.
Cowlishaw G. & Dunbar R. (2000). Primate Conservation Biology. University of Chicago Press.
In this text, the writers have done an integration of radical theoretical developments with the priorities of practical management to offer policymakers and scientists the tools that they require in helping to ensure that these species are kept from disappearing forever. The writers presents the conservation strategies together with management practices that cal help in the preservation of these endangered species.
Hauser M. D. (1988). How infant vervet monkeys learn to recognize starling alarm calls: The role of experience. Behaviour, 105, 3, 187-201.
This article talks about the adaptation of the infant vervet monkeys to the recognition of the starling alarm calls. According to the writers, experience plays a very critical role as they become more used to the starling alarm calls as they grow. They claim that those prays that can be in a position of escaping effectively from predation will be favored by the natural selection.