StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Socratic religion: Is Socrates irreligious or impious - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
Socrates is not irreligious because he categorically states that he actually does believe in some of the same gods that are feted by the state. What Socrates stated that he was against were the stories that were associated with different Greek gods…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER92.1% of users find it useful
Socratic religion: Is Socrates irreligious or impious
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Socratic religion: Is Socrates irreligious or impious"

?Socratic Religion: Is Socrates Irreligious or Impious? Socrates is not irreligious because he categorically s that he actually does believe in some of the same gods that are feted by the state. What Socrates stated that he was against were the stories that were associated with different Greek gods. This is because these tales are not particularly praiseworthy or virtuous in ways that are often associated, in different cultures, with godly character. Socrates even addresses the fact that he regularly offers the sacrifices that are required in various temples of different Greek gods. Many times, Socrates also mentioned a ‘God’- meaning that he might have had monotheistic inclinations. This, however, could have been construed as being an atheist in the Greek city states which promoted belief in a whole slew of gods and goddesses. Comparison between Socrates’ view of religion in the ‘Euthyphro’ and the ‘Apology’ The Apology, as well as the Euthyphro portrays Socrates as a religious figure who believed in the abilities of deities that are vastly superior to human beings in regards to power and wisdom. Socrates hinted at his belief in a unified God who holds a firm opinion on what constitutes as being un-pious or pious. In the account of Euthyphro, Euthyphro agrees that there are some things are hated and also loved by the gods. The Apology, on the other hand, has the passage where Socrates defends himself from accusations of corrupting the local youth. He also defends himself from the accusation of being an atheist. His defense was systematically carried out through his cross-examination of craftsmen, politicians, and poets. Socrates does not really sanction the intellectualist denunciation of divination's efficacy but accepts the traditional concept that the gods really do communicate with humankind through signs. For all his rationalism, Socrates seems to sanction the validity of the alleged god-given messages found in divination, dreams, and other such customarily accepted signs from gods and goddesses. In the Apology, Socrates spoke of hearing and hearkening to dreams, and also obeying the Delphic oracle. Socrates even encouraged his own students to seek the counsel of diviners and seers. In the ‘Euthyphro’, Socrates adopted a skeptical view of different aspects of traditional Greek belief in the abilities of gods and goddesses even though he still remained deeply religious himself, as was evidenced in the statements “Holiness is what is pleasing to the gods…If you are pleasing the gods with sacrifices, then you are doing what is pleasing to them” (Plato and Gallop 2008). Socrates’ and his Accusers’ view or religion Socrates held the view that the only reasonable understanding of the God(s) was through their appeal as paragons of Virtue and morality. Their personification of these moral values is what rendered them as being worthy of worship. Socrates does not openly accept the gods in the same way that most of the citizens in the city receive them. Socrates’ three accusers, on the other hand, appear to have believed that every citizen has a duty to remain faithful to the state-sanctioned gods and not any others. Meletus, one of his accusers, appeared to be of the opinion that the only way in which Socrates could be said to be a true believer is if he worshipped the gods as stipulated by convention and did not seek to question any of the qualities ascribed to them by the society. To the charge of being an atheist, Socrates countered that a true atheist would not believe in the possibility of the existence of any gods whether they have good or bad attributes. Anytus and Lycon, a representative of orators, also espoused the same beliefs as Meletus but also condemned Socrates for judging the religious beliefs and preferences of the mainstream ancient Greece society. Moreover, it would seem that Lycon, Anytus, and Meletus were mainly aggravated by Socrates’ elevation by the oracle at Delphi which proclaimed him to be one of the wisest men that had ever lived (Plato and Gallop 2008). As an orator who actively critiqued people’s lives, activities and religious habits, Socrates offended the sensibilities of these men who felt that Socrates was exulting himself above others and seeking to bring changes in how people, particularly the youth, thought about their own lives. Are both of these religious views normal and reasonable? Socrates held commendable views on the role of ethics in the interpretation of the gods and goddesses in ancient Greece. His main objective in his trial in the ‘Apology’ was not to show himself as being wiser than all other Athenians, but to convince his hearers that the unfairness of some of the acts attributed to the gods were not conducive to generating good ethical values in the rest of Athenian society. Socrates also wanted to draw the attention of the local citizens to erroneous judging procedures and regulations. The charges of godlessness, or corrupting the morals of the youth were false accusations posed by Socrates’ opposition in order to destroy his standing in the community. Socrates’ accusers, while having erroneous beliefs and ulterior motives in charging him with these accusations, were acting in what they thought was the best way to deal with Socrates’ frightening influence on the youth. The youth are the futures’ leaders in any nation. The man who is able to control or change their views will inevitably have power over the future government. It is possible that Socrates’ accusers feared his growing influence over the youth in the city states and sought to curb it by any means. Are Socrates’ views in any way a threat to the city? Are they the basis for a religious charge? The fact is that the accusations aimed at Socrates were motivated by vengeance on the part of the Athen’s power-holders such as poets, politicians, and manual artisans, and not a genuine religious charge. Socrates himself stated, “...and this is what will condemn me, if it does condemn me: not Meletus or Antyus, but the jealousy and slander of the many. This has condemned many other good citizens too, and I guess it will also convict me. And there is no possibility that it will stop me” (Plato and Gallop 2008). Socrates had exposed the religious practices and speeches as being empty words that were not based on knowledge and actual wisdom. Socrates’ actually benefited the Greek city-states through his biting observations. In answer to his accusers, he stated that for him, willingly corrupting any citizen would simply be impossible, “...I am not even aware that if I ever do something wrong or underhanded to any of my colleagues, I will risk getting a bad response from him?” (Plato and Gallop 2008). If Socrates was not irreligious, how could the charge, especially interpreted by Meletus as atheism, have convinced the jurors? The Athenians, like many other ancient cultures in bygone eras, believed that human beings could cause offense to the gods in different ways and that when this happened, the gods would wreak their vengeance on the hapless people who annoyed them until there was genuine repentance. To discourage ordinary citizens from intentionally or unintentionally annoying the gods, the authorities in Athens passed a law that made impiety a transgression that was punishable under the law. It was this rule that Meletus accused Socrates of breaking. Even if Socrates believed in some kinds of gods, Meletus could have used his distrust of the state-recognized gods and his trust in new, strange and unknown gods as the basis for posing charges of heresy against Socrates. Reference Plato & Gallop, D. (2008) Defence of Socrates, Euthyphro, Crito (Oxford World's Classics), Oxford University Press, New York. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Socratic religion: Is Socrates irreligious or impious Essay”, n.d.)
Socratic religion: Is Socrates irreligious or impious Essay. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1486418-socratic-religion-is-socrates-irreligious-or
(Socratic Religion: Is Socrates Irreligious or Impious Essay)
Socratic Religion: Is Socrates Irreligious or Impious Essay. https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1486418-socratic-religion-is-socrates-irreligious-or.
“Socratic Religion: Is Socrates Irreligious or Impious Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1486418-socratic-religion-is-socrates-irreligious-or.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Socratic religion: Is Socrates irreligious or impious

Antigone and Euthyphro

However, the presence of Socrates in this story made the character of Euthyphro confused over the real meaning of piety, for Euthyphro has always believed that making his father liable for killing an individual is the right thing to do, and that his father has committed a wrongdoing, which is impious.... socrates was the key to letting Euthyphro realize that his own beliefs of what is pious do not justify the act of being pious itself....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

A Dialogue between Socrates and Euthyphro

Says Socrates, “Tell me then, what is the pious, and what the impious, do you say?... First, he says “I say that the pious is to do what I am doing now, to prosecute the wrongdoer, be it about murder or temple robbery or anything else, whether the wrongdoer is your father or your mother or anyone else; not to prosecute is impious.... Second, he says “Well then, what is dear to the gods is pious, what is not is impious” (7) Thus, holiness is defined by what the gods like and mutually consent....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

Philosophical Dialogue with Euthyphro

socrates, on the other hand, acknowledges in truth that a man who is capable of prosecution ought to specialize in affirming what “piety” is.... socrates, on the other hand, acknowledges in truth that a man who is capable of prosecution ought to specialize in affirming what “piety” is.... Out of this situation, hence, emerges the issue of defining ‘piety' or ‘holiness' in which socrates takes advantage of his humble condition, being accused of ‘impiety', to find resolution to the question of piety through his philosophical dialogue with Euthyphro....
3 Pages (750 words) Essay

Definition of Piety by Euthyphro and Socrates

Consequently, the alleged pious actions become both impious and pious.... In his third attempt, Euthyphro argues that things loved by all gods are pious and things hated by all gods are impious.... Socrates goal in the dialect Socrates argument in the dialect seeks to establish that there are no pious and impious things.... socrates Name Institution Piety: Euthyphro vs.... socrates Euthyphro is on his way to the King Archon's court to attend a preliminary hearing when he meets socrates outside the court....
3 Pages (750 words) Essay

Sophists and Socrates

This paper ''Sophists and socrates'' tells that The second period of the Greek philosophy covering V and VI centuries up to X one, as opposed to the unilateral direction of previous philosophy, begins also unilaterally, namely it begins with the statement of anthropological problems....    Against this doctrine of sophists acts socrates.... But certainly, socrates also was a person of his time....
24 Pages (6000 words) Essay

Western civilization. Ideas of Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle

Amongst the ranks of Sophist came socrates (c.... Amongst the ranks of Sophist came socrates (c.... , who came from a wealthy and powerful family and devoted himself to teachings of philosophy under socrates at a young age of twenty.... [2]socrates was a classical Greek philosopher.... socrates argued that the moral excellence was a matter of divine legacy and not the 1) Steven Kreis, the history guide, Lecture 6: The Greek thoughts: socrates, Plato and Aristotle, 2000....
6 Pages (1500 words) Essay

Euthyphro Dilemma and the Concept of Divine Piety

This work "Euthyphro Dilemma and the Concept of Divine Piety" describes the issue of Euthyphro's Dilemma, as conceived by socrates and recorded by Plato.... The author takes into account the problem of faith, the nature, and conception of piety, a critique of socrates' skepticism by presenting a cohesive and philosophical sound argument.... hellip; Among the most prominent ancient philosophers, socrates, Plato, and Aristotle are the stalwarts of the Enlightenment epistemic traditions of intricate debates on religious, ethical, and political theorizations, which center on and around several of these topics....
8 Pages (2000 words) Essay

The Four Doctrines of Socrates on Life

This report "The Four Doctrines of socrates on Life" presents socrates who was, it seems, a rebel – someone who went against the grain of Athenian culture and dared to think his own thoughts and be his own person.... rdquo;… The philosopher socrates (469-399 B.... In almost every respect, socrates was very different from the ideal Greek citizen.... Because socrates has gained such status, and because he never wrote anything himself, it is almost impossible to separate the facts from the fiction....
8 Pages (2000 words) Report
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us