StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Advantages and Disadvantages, Pros and Cons, of Group Decision Making - Assignment Example

Cite this document
Summary
This assignment "Advantages and Disadvantages, Pros and Cons, of Group Decision Making" discusses what aspects to be avoided in multi-departmental decision making in order for them to be effective. Group decisions are acceptable to all since everybody is represented during the process…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER92.1% of users find it useful
Advantages and Disadvantages, Pros and Cons, of Group Decision Making
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Advantages and Disadvantages, Pros and Cons, of Group Decision Making"

Advantages and disadvantages, pros and cons, of group decision making Introduction Keller & Price pointed out that an organisation that have to develop and maintain competitive advantage has to devise mechanisms of involving every employee into the decision making process. A study conducted by Freeman (1999) in an investigation of the importance of including employees in a decision making process documented that, organisations that include employees in decisions of the running of the organisation have higher chances of developing organisational culture that pushes the organisation to higher levels. In this regard, the facets of the success of any organisations are denoted by the strategic decisions made through initiatives such as group decision making and other strategic positioning plans. Nevertheless, specific aspects of decisions should be avoided in order to make departments effective. Stone (2013) articulated on core aspects that touches on sensitive matters and which should be avoided for effective running of organisations. In fact, Freeman (1999) further argued that group decision making can only yield good results if a set of conditions pertaining the group chemistry are met. Advantages of group decision making It is evident that group members have different skills and competence. Thus, sharing of ideas and information on a particular issue can lead to more information and more comprehensive. The ground for the argument is many alternatives are provided and the most appropriate one is chosen from the list. This is unlike in situations where one individual is left to make decisions that affect a whole company or department. Chances of getting the best outcome are minimal when compared to individual decision making. In addition, the whole process becomes effective since issues related to revising the decisions made are minimal especially because the whole group is present or representatives are present during decision making. Thus, group decisions are acceptable by all since everybody is represented during the process. DuBrin (2012) conversely observed that, with group decision making, biases are eliminated especially those that come in as a result of lack of inclusion of the target individuals. In a broader sense, group decision making acts a training ground for subordinate and new members. They learn skills of articulating on matters as well as the importance of collaborative workforce. Further, group decision making is viewed as a democratic style of leadership, which is inclusive and accommodates views from all the parties and consolidate them before arriving into a single decision that suits everybody. Disadvantages of group decision making Since the process involves many people, it translates to consumption of more time as compared to when decisions are made by one or two individuals. If an organisation wants to make decisions concerning adjustments of the employees’ performance, it may take time before the right individuals to represent the employees or departments are identified (Lewis, 2007). In addition, the whole process of deliberating on the issues to go by is tedious and meetings can keep on being postponed till a common agreement is reached. In some instances, some people might not be in favour of the decisions being deliberated on, so they might choose to oppose the decisions being made just to see that the decisions made favor them. In this regard, self centered interests tend to control most of the decisions made in group decision making. The end result of decisions made from such point of views diminishes the efficiency of the process as well as the intended quality of the decision made. In a different dimension, some social ties within members create confusion when it comes to participating in decision making. Social pressure makes such individuals to simply agree with their friends for sake of agreement for them not to look like odd-man out. Thus, the personality of wanting to be a good member of the group have the tendency of silencing them and actually finds it difficult to disagree with other members and always finds pleasure in favouring consensus. Aspects to be avoided in multi departmental decision making in order for them to be effective Lack of policy guidance should be discouraged at all costs. When a group is meeting to deliberate on different issues affecting the company, it is indispensable for the members to be given clearly defined policy guidance (Schermerhorn, 2010). This helps in clearing doubts about the intentions of such meetings. In addition, the desired outcomes are pointed out to have the theme of the meeting clearly spelt out. In addition, it is imperative to avoid low team authority. When there is no defined framework of what should be achieved or on how to achieve it, decisions are either ambiguous or unrealistic. When there is no authority in the group, the lead legacy gets confusing and it becomes difficult for members to constructively make sound decisions. Thus, designating roles in a group decision making is critical in that it makes things run effectively. Avoiding internal politics in group decision making is another concern that has to be addressed. Bias and intimidation of any kind in a group decision making can lead to poor decisions (Lewis, 2007). Group mindsets should only focus on organisational goals and objectives. Additionally, lack of integration is a critical issue that affects the quality of decisions made. When making decisions that affect every individual within the organisation, it is indispensable to ensure that every stakeholder is included in the decision making. Conclusion The facets of the success of any organisations are denoted by the strategic decisions made through initiatives such as group decision making. Sharing of ideas and information in group decision making on a particular issue can lead to more information and more comprehensive. Group decisions are acceptable by all since everybody is represented during the process. Biases are eliminated especially those that come in as a result of lack of inclusion of the absentees. Nevertheless, since the process involves many people, it translates to consumption of more time as compared to when decisions are made by one or two individuals. Additionally, some social ties within members create confusion when it comes to participating in decision making. Lack of policy guidance should be avoided. In addition, internal politics should be avoided to avoid poor decisions. Reference list: Top of Form Top of Form Top of Form Top of Form Top of Form Top of Form DuBrin, A. J. (2012). Essentials of management. Mason, Ohio: South- Western/Thomson Learning. Freeman, R. M. (1999). Correctional organization and management: Public policy challenges, behavior, and structure. Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann. Keller, S., & Price, C. (2011). Beyond performance: How great organizations build ultimate competitive advantage. Hoboken, N.J: Wiley. Lewis, P. S. (2007). Management: Challenges for tomorrows leaders. Mason, OH: Thomson/South-Western. Schermerhorn, J. R. (2010). Exploring management. Hoboken, N.J: Wiley. Stone, D. (2013). Stepping stones to business success. S.l.: Balboa Press International. Bottom of Form Bottom of Form Bottom of Form Bottom of Form Bottom of Form Bottom of Form Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Analyse and discuss the advantages and disadvantages, pros and cons, Assignment”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/management/1666255-analyse-and-discuss-the-advantages-and-disadvantages-pros-and-cons-of-group-decision-making-what-aspects-should-be-avoided-in-multi-departmental-decision-making-in-order-for-them-to-be-effective
(Analyse and Discuss the Advantages and Disadvantages, Pros and Cons, Assignment)
https://studentshare.org/management/1666255-analyse-and-discuss-the-advantages-and-disadvantages-pros-and-cons-of-group-decision-making-what-aspects-should-be-avoided-in-multi-departmental-decision-making-in-order-for-them-to-be-effective.
“Analyse and Discuss the Advantages and Disadvantages, Pros and Cons, Assignment”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/management/1666255-analyse-and-discuss-the-advantages-and-disadvantages-pros-and-cons-of-group-decision-making-what-aspects-should-be-avoided-in-multi-departmental-decision-making-in-order-for-them-to-be-effective.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Advantages and Disadvantages, Pros and Cons, of Group Decision Making

The Rational Model of Decision-Making and Simons Normative Model

Contrast brainstorming, the nominal group technique, the Delphi technique, computer-aided decision-making, and summarize the pros and cons of involving groups in the decision-making process.... However, the disadvantage is that group decision making are time consuming and can be chaotic.... Further, arriving at a common consensus remains a challenge in group decision making process.... The rational model of decision making follows four standard steps in decision-making process....
2 Pages (500 words) Essay

Business Management Affairs

The advantages and disadvantages of sole proprietorship, however, need a deeper and keen observation to form a decision based on the examination of the three available options for us.... This recommendation would provide advantages and disadvantages of sole trader, Limited Liability Company and partnerships.... Sole trading maintains the highest level of autonomy in terms of running the business, choosing activities, methods and making autonomous decisions....
7 Pages (1750 words) Coursework

Organisational Behaviour: Concepts, Controversies, and Applications

Bibliography 12 Title “Select three decision making tools studied in the Managing Decisions Modules and evaluate their advantages and disadvantages.... Against this background, this report seeks to critically evaluate the approach of decision making through focusing on three methods that can be used in decision making and these include the following: project management, knowledge management as well as delegation management The report will outline the advantages and disadvantages of each decision making tool mentioned above and the third part will focus on how these methods can be combined in order to improve decision making in business....
11 Pages (2750 words) Essay

Rational Decision-Making Model

This research will begin with the statement that decision making is required in every field whether it is business or routine life activities.... Rational decision making is considered a multi-step procedure which requires logical and sound decisions to be made executed in an orderly manner starting from problem initiation through a solution.... The entire process starts with a formulation of goal, identification of criteria for decision making and then working on the alternatives for making analysis and making the finalized decision....
6 Pages (1500 words) Essay

Marketing Decision Making

pros and cons: advertising.... The Flower World needs effective marketing and advertising campaigns in order to attract consumes and inform target audience about the new service and its benefits.... Societal institutions such as advertising arise because of economic, social, and cultural need....
8 Pages (2000 words) Essay

Pros and Cons of Working in Right-To-Work and the Forced Unionism States from an Employee Point of View

Through this paper, the question of, whether employees should be subjected to right-to-work laws or unionization laws – depending on their advantages and disadvantages – will be answered.... From the discussion, the advantages and the disadvantages of the two systems show that RTW favors organizations, but unionization is friendlier to the affairs of workers.... The disadvantages of an RTW system include that a less competitive worker will get low The advantages of unionization include that employees enjoy more benefits, employment is more secure and senior workers are usually secure....
6 Pages (1500 words) Research Paper

Advantages And Disadvantages The Federal And Unitary Government

ros and cons of Unitary System of Government (Central Administration) ... ros and cons of Federalism ... This essay is about the "advantages and disadvantages The Federal And Unitary Government".... ower-sharing has its advantages and disadvantages.... Such are the points that are to be given when working on an "advantages and disadvantages the federal and unitary government politics essay.... overnments could be classified based on their decision-making process....
6 Pages (1500 words) Essay

Advantages and Disadvantages of the Federal and Unitary Government

With the info in it, you can clearly understand the various pros and cons of these two forms of govts, i.... From there, it will also provide you with some pros and cons for both that you might want to review.... This essay is about the "advantages and disadvantages of the Federal and Unitary Government".... As such, it has both its advantages and disadvantages.... he above is a valid example representing one of the advantages and disadvantages of the federal and unitary government politics essay....
7 Pages (1750 words) Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us