StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Judicial Function in Creating Common Laws - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
The paper "Judicial Function in Creating Common Laws" discusses that role of judges extends to interpreting laws and in some cases, the judicial function has seen the creation of common laws. Common laws are created by judges in order to address modern problems…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER94.4% of users find it useful
Judicial Function in Creating Common Laws
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Judicial Function in Creating Common Laws"

Judicial function in creating common laws Introduction In England, parliament makes the law and judges implement it, this is simply dichotomy in theory. In practice, however, the role of judges may also extend to interpreting law and in some cases the judicial function has seen the creation of common laws. Common laws are the principles and rules that are found in court procedures and judgments1. The dominant source of law is parliament, but English judges also make laws through their decisions in court cases. Parliament makes laws through statutes or delegated legislation through regulations2. Generally, judges cannot challenge the constitutionality of parliament Acts, but can declare certain provisions or the whole act as void and with no effect on the judicial system3. In common law legal systems such as England, previous court decisions and legislation for the bulky of the laws and different levels of courts have an obligation to follow the case precedents. According to Justice McCardie of England, ‘the objectives of common laws by judges is to solve the difficulties and make adjustments to the changing social and commercial scenarios since expanding societies demand changes in laws’4. Traditionally, English judges have followed piece-meal or low-key note law-making in order to avoid criticisms of undemocratic actions. The judicial role in making law was raised in the case of Knulller v DPP (1973) AC 435 when Lord Simon outlined that conversation in Director of Public prosecutions v Shaw indicated that English courts had residual power of creating new offences. The case of C (A Minor) v DPP (1996) AC 1 pointed out some guidelines that judges should follow in judicial law-making. Generally, the judges must be cautious of imposing own remedies and fundamental legal foundations must be considered before making new law. The judge must refrain from making laws on areas where parliament has rejected or has experienced difficulties in legislation. Accordingly, the judicial changes to the law must aim at attaining certainty and finality5. Judges are bound by established court traditions to decide cases along the lines of earlier decisions, but sometimes the case facts may differ thus forcing judges to compare the situations and use common principles in developing new facts that form a case precedent6. A good example of judicial creation of law where the judges face legal situation that lack clear guidance of statute and case precedents is the case of Donoghue v. Stevens (1932) AC 562 where the judges created a new law by establishing a legal relationship matching the consumer’s expectations7. The judges established a new type of tort by establishing that a manufacturer owes a duty of care to a consumer who purchases the products from an intermediary. The existing statutes did not provide for consumer protection and there was no existing contractual relationship between the defendant (manufacturer) and the plaintiff (consumer). Although the tort of breach of duty of care already existed, the case decision extended the existing legal principles due to changes in the society such as purchase of branded and packaged products. The judges did not interpret the existing legal principle, but made a common law that forms the basis of consumer protection and ensures manufacturers meet the consumer product expectations8. Although judges are expected to undertake their judicial role as judges and not arbitrators, English courts have created rules that have lawful force. The eminent judges have sometimes disagreed on the application of legal principles thus forcing the majority of the bench to make a case decision that will form a precedent9. A case example is the Young v. Bristol v. Aeroplane Parts (1944) court of appeal decision where judges held that the Court of Appeal need not follow its own decisions where it is clear that the case was made per incuriam. The House of Lords criticised the practice of deciding a previous case per incuriam in the case of Rookes v. Barnard (1964) through outlining that Court of Appeal could not grant such ‘gratuitous’ advice to a superior court of law10. Lord Dyson asserted that the development of judge-made law is incremental since it responds to new ideas and new events. According to the case of Hedley Byrne Co Ltd v Heller & partners Ltd (1964) AC 465, the judges provided a far reaching extension of law of negligence by establishing the doctrine of negligent misrepresentation11. In this case, a duty of care exists where an advisee seeks information from an advisor who has special knowledge and skills. Another case where judges have interpreted and made laws is the case of R v R (Rape: marital exemption) (1992) 1 AC 599 that held that there no longer a statutory rule that a wife is deemed to consent to sexual intercourse with the husband. The judge made law extended the sexual offences and created a case precedent on marital rape thus forming new English common law12. English legal system allows judges to create common law through their court decisions that become case precedents and enforceable laws of the judicial system. The judges make the case precedents on particular legal principles and facts and courts may be constrained by precedents from previous cases thus forcing the judges to adhere to doctrines of judicial precedents13. According to Lord Lloyd observation in the case of Kleinwort Benson Ltd v Lincoln City Council (1992) 2 AC 349, case law is dynamic and can be changed since decisions of the Court of Appeal can be overruled while parliament can undertake reforms of the law that remove all the judge made common laws14. Conclusion In practice, role of judges extend to interpreting laws and in some cases the judicial function has seen the creation of common laws. Common laws are created by judges in order to address modern problems and situations that require case precedents where statutory codification is not available. Judicial law-making role in English judicial system is evidenced by the common law that has resulted from court decisions and numerous interpretations of parliament statutes. However, the role of judges is strictly to implement and enforce the law without making any changes or issuing other interpretations to the acts. Bibliography: Allen, C.J. The law of evidence in Victorian England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1997. Barker, David. Law made simple. New York: Routledge. 2014. Bast, Carol and Pyle, Ransford. Foundations of law: cases, commentary and ethics. London: Cengage Learning. 2010. Clarke, Richard. The science of law and lawmaking. New York: Cengage Learning Press. 2005. Green, Ian. The courts. London: UBC Press. 2010. Hallam, Henry. The constitutional history of Engand. London: CUP Press. 2004. Jacqueline Martin. The English legal system, 3rd Ed. London: Hodder & Stoughton. 2002. P 18. Ridges, Edward. Constitutional law of England. New York: Cengage Learning Press. 1997. Shapiro, Martin. Courts: a comparative and political analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 2007. Wilson, Stephen., Rutherford, Helen and Storey, Tony. English legal system. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2014. Case laws R v R (Rape: marital exemption) (1992) 1 AC 599. Donoghue v. Stevens (1932) AC 562. Hedley Byrne Co Ltd v Heller & partners Ltd (1964) AC 465. Kleinwort Benson Ltd v Lincoln City Council (1992) 2 AC 349. Young v. Bristol v. Aeroplane Parts (1944). Read More
Tags
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“In England Parliament makes the law and judges implement it, this is a Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/law/1668882-in-england-parliament-makes-the-law-and-judges-implement-it-this-is-a-simply-dichotomy-in-theory-in-practice-however-the-role-of-judges-may-also-extend-to-interpreting-law-and-in-some-cases-the-judicial-function-has-seen-the-creation-of-common-laws
(In England Parliament Makes the Law and Judges Implement It, This Is a Essay)
https://studentshare.org/law/1668882-in-england-parliament-makes-the-law-and-judges-implement-it-this-is-a-simply-dichotomy-in-theory-in-practice-however-the-role-of-judges-may-also-extend-to-interpreting-law-and-in-some-cases-the-judicial-function-has-seen-the-creation-of-common-laws.
“In England Parliament Makes the Law and Judges Implement It, This Is a Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/law/1668882-in-england-parliament-makes-the-law-and-judges-implement-it-this-is-a-simply-dichotomy-in-theory-in-practice-however-the-role-of-judges-may-also-extend-to-interpreting-law-and-in-some-cases-the-judicial-function-has-seen-the-creation-of-common-laws.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Judicial Function in Creating Common Laws

Separation of powers in Malaysia and United Kingdom

The function of the judiciary is to interpret the legislation in line with the intention of the parliament and develop the common law.... The judiciary includes the judges in the courts of law and those holding judicial offices in tribunals and the magistrates who work in the magistrate's courts.... In Malaysia, the judges do not exercise their judicial independence since they are appointed by the executive.... The right to exercise their judicial powers in delivering the judgments has been limited by the constitution....
7 Pages (1750 words) Essay

Should the United Kingdom Introduce a Written Constitution

When these set of laws are put in writing and bound in a single document it is then called a written constitution, otherwise it is referred to as an unwritten constitution.... Presently, most countries have formulated and are functioning and enforcing their laws through a written constitution.... Countries that function without a written constitution are similarly referred to as countries with an uncodified constitution as the sources of laws, governmental and individual rights are not contained in one fundamental instrument but rather embodied in a series of documents....
15 Pages (3750 words) Essay

The New Supreme Court of the United Kingdom

It only means creating a separate office with distinct responsibilities.... And certainly, there were mechanisms within the state to ensure judicial independence.... Severing the nexus or removing the overlap between judicial functions and parliamentary functions does not, after all, mean keeping both bodies in blinders, oblivious to the needs of the country....
9 Pages (2250 words) Essay

The System of Courts in the UK

This piece of work helped in advising the sovereign as well as passing laws at the highest level within the state.... Till the year 1399, it was the function of both Houses of Parliament to listen to petitions however, the end of this year marked the House of Commons to have no more involvement in such cases, thus leaving the House of Lords as the highest court of appeal.... The Guildhall will thus begin to function from October 2009 onwards for the purpose of serving as an apex body of justice....
10 Pages (2500 words) Essay

Do Judges Make the Law or Find It

It is no doubt that judges have a very special place in the legal system of countries that apply common laws.... While it is agreeable that judges have a special place in the legal system, there is a raging debate on their roles especially in regard to making laws.... There are those who believe that in the creative role of judges they make laws.... 1However, there are those who deny any creative role of judges and argue that those judges who make new rules or laws are thwarting people's will, or are usurping the legislature role....
9 Pages (2250 words) Essay

One of Three Pillars of the Justice System

In return, the government is expected to apply its laws with fairness and equality to every citizen.... To achieve this end, the three foundations of a justice system are the police for the enforcement function, the criminal justice system for court trials, and finally, the corrections or the prison system to incarcerate and rehabilitate those convicted of crimes against society.... Members of the criminal justice system, such as the prosecutors, defense attorneys, and judges or justices must at all times implement and interpret the law with probity, fairness, justice, equality, and solidarity in the pursuit of human rights protection for all, exercise their function without fear or favor....
3 Pages (750 words) Essay

The Creation of Equity and Its Difference From Common Law

These common laws however cannot be absolute in its application or implementations.... It is a supplement to strict laws which do not really provide an adequate remedy to mistakes or erring actions are done.... It developed when laws comprising common law became too rigid and technical that it led to inadequacy in upholding justice.... This function is limited to the non-discretionary judgment of laws.... The paper " The Creation of Equity and Its Difference From common Law" examines a change from common law to equity....
6 Pages (1500 words) Essay

Comparison of Federalist Paper 78 and Brutus XI

The most heated debate pitched the Federalists and Anti-Federalists was the powers handed over to the judiciary system in declaring laws as per the Constitution.... The proposed Constitution handed the sovereign mandate to the court to declare laws that could not be reviewed by a branch of the government.... The analysis proves that he agrees with the mandate of the judicial in turning down laws passed by congress.... The ground for turning down the laws is when the judicial feels like the laws are against the Constitutional tenants....
6 Pages (1500 words) Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us