StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Criminal Justice Process - Research Paper Example

Cite this document
Summary
This essay talks about criminal justice which is explained as a group of practices, strategies and courts intended to sustain social accountability, dissuading and mitigating crimes and implementing penalties against those found responsible of committing crimes. …
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER91.7% of users find it useful
Criminal Justice Process
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Criminal Justice Process"

Criminal Justice Process Criminal justice is explained as a group of practices, strategies and courts intended to sustain social accountability, dissuading and mitigating crimes and implementing penalties against those found responsible of committing crimes. The criminal justice system comprises of three major components that work together to see the criminal justice process throughout the beginning to end. Criminal al justice can also be seen as the application or study of laws concerning criminal behaviour. Criminal justice governs the process of investigation, evidence gathering, arresting, charging, defending, trial conduction, sentencing and implementation of punishments (Baum, 1996). People who endeavor to understand the criminal justice system include police officers, judiciary workers, adult or juvenile probation officers, investigators, correctional officers, crime scene technicians, private security guards, lawyers who prosecute or defend the criminals. It is essential that criminal justice includes the word justice, since laws should be fair to both the guilty and the innocent (Mays, 2000). The enforcement and rendering of decision of cases has been under the directive of specific courts. These different courts deal with different cases and cannot make decisions in cases that are not under their jurisdiction. The different types of courts are high court, federal court and the state court. These different courts play different roles, but there are roles that seem to be similar but enforced in different capacities. The courts enforce laws. A common example of the law’s enforcement is in the case of copyright infringement, where the courts are mandated to enforce the laws that govern (Mays & Peter, 2000). The courts have the responsibility of interpreting the laws, and especially to laymen who may not easily understand the terms used. The legal profession uses words and phrases that are easily understandable to people in the profession, and who refer to each other as learned friend. The courts should also be able to define terms which are easily understandable, as their use in different clauses of laws will have different meanings (Earl, Robert & Araten, 1989). The courts enjoy the privilege to invalidate unconstitutional laws. These unconstitutional laws are laws that are contrary to the constitution. The constitution is perceived as the most important law of a country. Some of the unconstitutional laws claim that the constitution violates stipulations in the bill of rights. The courts also have the role of making laws (Mays & Peter, 2000). They are able to create common laws, which may not be covered with statutes. In many state laws, right to individuals privacy and publicity are protected under these common laws (Baum, 1996). The criminal justice system is a set of legal and social frameworks for enforcing criminal laws according to well define procedures and limitations. In the execution of cases, we must realize that there are different types of criminal cases. Criminal cases are categorized under different groups, namely, violent crimes with examples such as armed robbery, child abuse and domestic violence, white collar crimes such as frauds, bribery and extortion. Drug crimes may include crimes such as possessing, manufacturing and transportation of drugs. Sex crimes, on the other hand, include crimes such as rape sodomy and prostitution (Mays & Peter, 2000). Other crimes which may not fit under these categories include arms trafficking, burglary, hit and run and perjury. However, these crimes are divided into certain two classes; misdemeanors are considered to be petty crimes which may be punishable by fines and or less than one year jail term. Capital crimes which are only punishable by life imprisonment or death sentences. Juvenile crimes are crimes committed by minors. The last class of crimes is felonies. These are seen as serious crimes punishable by payment of fines and imprisonment exceeding one year (Baum, 1996). In the event that a crime is committed, and the case of reported to the police station, there is a criminal justice process that is undertaken. The process is done so as to ensure that the culprit who is apprehended for the crime is guilty. Still we cannot confidently say that in all the cases that are decided, the people who are sentenced are guilty (Mays, 2000). Among the steps that are involved in the criminal justice process include the below stated. Investigation of the crime by the criminal division of the police, from the moment a crime is reported During this investigation, the police gather as much evidence as they can, so as to identify and apprehend the culprit. Probable cause of a crime is the standard proof required for a search. This means that facts and information on evidence of a crime in a place have been availed. Culprits found guilty of crimes face severe consequences, with punishments spanning from probation, supervision and payment of fines to the loss of freedom by being confined (Mays & Peter, 2000). Arrest of crime suspect or suspects An arrest for a person will be granted by the state court, when there is probable cause for the commitment of the crime. This means that a connection between the suspect and the crime has been established. Once a suspect has been arrested they will remain the custody of the police until they are arraigned in court. For people to be arraigned it is stipulated that they should not stay for more than 48 hours without appearing before the court (Mays & Peter, 2000). First court appearance by the suspect Once a complaint has been filed, the suspect will either be issued with an arrested or summoning notice to appear before the court of law. In the event that a summon is delivered and the suspect fails to appear, there will be an arrest warrant issued by the judge. At the first court appearance, suspects are counseled on their rights. This is important so that the suspect does not perform activities that will be considered to interfere with the court case. During this process, the prosecutor weighs factors including the gravity of the crime and the potency of the evidence provided. The suspect is given the opportunity for a plea and they can either plead guilty or not. In this step a bail can either be issued depending on the case (Earl, Robert & Araten, 1989). Setting the bail The bail for the suspect should be made within twelve hours from the time the complaint is filed. All defendants have the right of bail under the state’s constitution. In the event that a bail has been posted and the defendant settles it, they can be released until the charges listed in the complaint file are determined. Clearance of the bail can be in monetary terms or property (Mays & Peter, 2000). If the defendant has considerable ties to the community and or prior criminal record, they will be considered for Release of Own Recognizance (R.O.R), an affidavit declaring they are conscious of the charges against them and will avail themselves to court to face charges. Defendants sometimes will be expected to give a personal bond, which is an affirmation to appear for the judgment, forfeiting a specified amount of money. The bail money will be refunded in full once the case is determined or disposed. Once defendant a freed, bail is released to the surety. When the bail is set, investigation of the defendant’s amenability is done. Bail investigation considers the weightiness and severity of the crime upon conviction (Buzawa, 1996). The right to counsel During the first appearance, the defendant is instructed on their rights to counsel, meaning that they have a right to have an attorney present to represent them. If they show they cannot afford an attorney, an attorney is provided to them by the state. Assignment of a public attorney is done after an indigence investigation, which judges the defendants possessions and liabilities (Buzawa, 1996). Private attorneys are expensive, and they may be self employed or work in private laws firms and charge hourly for their services. Still in the indigence investigation, the ability of family members and friend to post the bail is also determined. In a case where the defendant is found to have the means of paying for an attorney, the case supervisor will advocate that the application for indigent defense service be rejected (Mays & Peter, 2000). The defendant is then evaluated for substance abuse According to a study by the federal and state courts, seventy percent of are under the influence of drugs during the performance of the crime. This is as a way of determining whether the defendant uses drugs and if so, the extent to which they are addicted to the drugs (Earl, Robert & Araten, 1989). Defendants are subjected to urine screening for identification of drugs and then a drug assessment report is prepared, indicating drug abuse history, treatment needed and proposals for local counseling for the criminal judge (Buzawa, 1996). This assessment is usually performed to people charged with drugs and possession crimes. Judges have the right to order the defendant to seek treatment as a condition for bail and probation. Failure to comply with the conditions for bail will lead to sanctions, and as a result revocation of the probation (Mays & Peter, 2000). Pre-indictment events In the completion of filing the case and the first court appearance, the prosecutor will now determine whether to proceed with the case or dismiss it. Prosecutors will determine whether the evidence provided so far is enough to follow a conviction. In some countries, the prosecutor’s case screening division analyses the reports and interview presented by the police to verify if the original charges will be indicted (Buzawa, 1996). When there is deficient evidence, the charges are reduce to disorderly person’s offenses and remanded or sent to municipal courts for a hearing or discharge. In some counties, prosecutor’s pre-screen probable Superior Court filing prior to a complaint is signed (Mays & Peter, 2000). Plea bargains These are negotiations that are made between the prosecutor and defendant’s lawyer. The prosecutor may offer the defendant an arrangement for the reduction of charges in the event that the defendant will take the guilty plea. In other cases the plea bargain may lead to the reduction or discharge of the case (Earl, Robert & Araten, 1989). Defendants entering into a plea agreement have to sign a declaration certifying that they understand the plea and are willingly entering into the agreement, without coercion by the prosecutor (Mays & Peter, 2000). They are also required to acknowledge that the criminal judge is not tied by the agreement when making their sentencing. Sometimes the judge may perceive the plea as too moderate and may thus discard it. In plea agreements, the defendant may need to make a guilty plea. If this decision is reached, the defendant must openly acknowledge it in court (Buzawa, 1996). Pre trial intervention program This is a diversionary program that permits specific defendants to evade official prosecution and conviction by entering into a term of court administered community living, regularly with counseling or other support. Defendants requesting for this program, are required to apply directly to the criminal division management. Case supervisors undertake investigations into the history of all defendants, to guarantee their eligibility (Earl, Robert & Araten, 1989). Grand jury for an indictment If a criminal case has not been dismissed, the prosecutor presents the case to the Grand jury for an indictment. The jury is composed of six people who are citizens of the country selected from the voter registers, driving licenses and tax payment lists. The grand jury examines the evidence offered by the prosecutor and decides whether there is satisfactory evidence to accuse defendants and oblige them to respond to the charge(s). The indictment returns within twenty one days, leading to a pre trial conference. Any new evidence that has been uncovered should be availed to the defenses council before the pre trial. This enables the defense to have time to review the new changes that will be used against the defendant (Buzawa, 1996). Defendants have rights to jury trials, but may forego this for a trial by a judge. During the trial, there are two outcomes that can be faced. The defendant may be found guilty or not guilty to the crime. Acquitted people have no obligations to the court. The defendant found guilty is convicted and faces a sentencing rendered by the judge. The presentence investigation report is intended to aid a judge in weighing the conditions of the crime and a defendants criminal and juvenile record and general life situation to the strictness of the sentence. The investigative reports supply a uniform evaluation of a defendants general family, medical and criminal background. Defendants who are convicted for a crime can appeal their case, and a review of their trial records and decisions rendered are checked to ensure the judge was just and impartial (Earl, Robert & Araten, 1989). People who are convicted as criminals have limited rights. Some of the rights that they may not enjoy include the right to vote, the right to bear firearms, the right to jury duty and limited freedom of association especially in cases of probation. People should therefore be extremely careful when performing their daily routines, as the slightest provocation may lead to dire consequences (Mays & Peter, 2000). References Baum, L. (2001). American Courts. 5th ed. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin. Buzawa, E. & Buzawa, C. (1996). Domestic Violence: The Criminal Justice Response. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Earl, M. M., Robert, F. W. & Araten, M. (1989). Selected Bibliography on State Constitutional Law, 1980–1989. Rutgers Law Journal, 20, 1093-1113. Mays, G. L. & Peter, R. G. (2000). Courts and Justice. Illinois: Waveland Press. Patrick, J. J. (1998). The Young Oxford Companion to the Supreme Court of the United States. New York: Oxford University Press. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Criminal Justice Process Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/law/1585654-criminal-justice-process
(Criminal Justice Process Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 Words)
https://studentshare.org/law/1585654-criminal-justice-process.
“Criminal Justice Process Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/law/1585654-criminal-justice-process.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Criminal Justice Process

Victims Rights Amendment: Is It Really Necessary

Others contend that there is sufficient recourse already in place for the sufferers, and fear that a constitutional amendment would actually inflict harm upon the Criminal Justice Process.... The argument centers upon the idea that victims of violent crime have no constitutional rights in the Criminal Justice Process.... 2) The other side of this debate, in acknowledging the need for victims to have access to-and a voice in-the Criminal Justice Process, considers the appropriate response to be at a systematic level beneath that of a constitutional amendment....
3 Pages (750 words) Essay

Children Victimology: Issues in the Criminal Justice System

The paper discusses and analyzes the different aspects of issues that are confronted by children victims and witnessed during the Criminal Justice Process.... Later, the paper recommends different steps that can be taken to minimize the adverse effects of the Criminal Justice Process on such children.... Moreover, it has been reported that a significant percentage of adults involved in criminal activities were engaged with the Criminal Justice Process in their childhood....
7 Pages (1750 words) Term Paper

Are Juries Fundamental to Adversarial Criminal Justice Process

The classic story of “Twelve Angry Men” promotes the message that jury trials promote justice because they enable a deeper examination of issues… Trials by jury are favored because they are viewed as stronger instruments of justice and fairness as compared to individual trial judges.... Jury trials have been advocated as an effective measure to bring justice to citizens, especially in criminal trials where jurors are believed to be better able to make assessments and judgments about character and believability of witnesses....
6 Pages (1500 words) Essay

Any subject in the criminal justce systre

This research paper “The Process of Criminal Justice” will discuss the procedure of Criminal Justice Process.... … The author claims that the Criminal Justice Process is an elaborate process that involves various stakeholders depending on the nature of crime involved.... The accused, the police, the courts, the state and attorneys are some of the stakeholders that may be involved in the process that mostly ends with the acquittal or punishment of the accused person....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

Mischief and Miscarriage in the Criminal Justice Process

Due to these high standards, it is meaningful that the program is obtained that will manage the loopholes for which many criminal have evaded justice through the criminal justice system (Ramsey, Latessa, & Travis 2003; p.... Such a process is sustainable on the basis that such persons are given corrective services while in their homes or with the society (Cohen 2002; p.... The condition that crime must be established beyond and reasonable doubt in a litigation process is a very high bar to attain in many litigation processes....
7 Pages (1750 words) Assignment

The importance of the victims in the criminal justice process

All this perspectives give an aspect of the role of the victim in the Criminal Justice Process.... … In this research, the discussion given revolves around the importance of the victim in the Criminal Justice Process.... It is important to affirm that the victim of a crime remains at the center of the Criminal Justice Process.... It is, therefore, effective to conclude that the victim of a crime remains pivotal to the Criminal Justice Process....
6 Pages (1500 words) Essay

Criminal Justice Process for a Felony Criminal Charge Filed

Every state has a systematic criminal justice system that ensures upholds the dictates of both justice and dignity for both the victims… The process consists of a number of serious activities undertaken by professionals who ensure that they provide satisfactory closure to the criminal cases in the states while according the suspects the desired justice, fairness and dignity (Gibson, 2002).... he criminal justice processes in the various states in the country are constitutional and run efficiently with the view to providing justice to all the parties involved as discussed in the essay below....
8 Pages (2000 words) Research Paper

Application of the Criminal Justice System

The prosecution and pretrial stage of the Criminal Justice Process is the stage in which the prosecutor, will analyze and evaluate the available evidence gathered by the police.... This essay presents the criminal justice system which refers to the agencies and the procedures that have been put in place by the government to prevent, control, apprehend and punish the lawbreakers within the society.... As the discussion highlights the criminal justice system follows a well elaborate process....
6 Pages (1500 words) Research Paper
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us