StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Safety Performance of the Organization - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
The paper "Safety Performance of the Organization " states that organizations need to comprehend how human factors affect safety and health safety performance. These include aspects of policy, the organization as a whole, planning and implementation and reviewing performance…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER95.3% of users find it useful

Extract of sample "Safety Performance of the Organization"

SAFETY AND HEALTH Student’s name Code & Course Professor’s name University City Date Safety and Health Successful organizations that significantly manage its health and safety offer a practical framework that enhances the contribution of the groups and individuals. Evidently, health and safety objectives are viewed the same way as business objectives. This is seen as part of the organizational culture, and it is realized by making health and safety an imperative management responsibility. Organizations need to comprehend how human factors affect safety and health safety performance. These include aspects of policy, the organization as a whole, planning and implementation and reviewing performance. Policy It is advised that policies are subjected to adequate policy checks that oversee the organization’s conformance to safety and health regulations. It is imperative for the organization to countercheck whether the policies are in line with the safety and health regulation of the governing body. Evidently, the board should ensure that all affiliated members are functioning towards the enhancement of the policies. This can be done through continued audits. In this regard, various guidelines and codes have been implemented in helping organizations report the safety performance of the organization. Policies should therefore be developed towards the successful implementation of specific attributes that affect the organisation in various functions. Organization Audits that pertain to the organization need to be conducted since it significantly highlights organizational problem that may have developed with time. Evidently, it will identify weak areas that have not conformed to the regulatory practice of health and safety. Additionally, audit on the organisation dispel divergent attributes that need to be aligned towards the set guidelines by the governing body. Missing such key aspects would imply that the organisation is otherwise functioning against the outlined laws of a region. Moreover, an organisation consolidates various stakeholders, who are tasked with overseeing the overall effectiveness of the organisation across different issues. Planning and implementation Planning is an important factor of any organization. All organizational planning should consolidate objectives that are garnered towards dispensing safety and health needs across different platforms. This is the most crucial aspects of any organisation. An organisation’s plan dispels its objectives, which guides the organisation’s operation. Moreover, a robust planning process suggests that the company is able to favourably undertake its functions effectively and towards the attainment of its goals (Williams, 2010). Audit on the implementation process is paramount given that the organisation ought to align its functions towards the attainment of specific objectives. In the case that an organisation deviates from the set goals, it is destined to fail ion the environment it functions (Williams, 2010). Measuring Performance As instrumental aspects of organizational development, measuring performance can be channelled towards the goal achievement against the set health and safety initiatives. Ensuring that the performance is aligned towards such goals is instrumental to overall the overall development. Measuring performance is an imperative aspect on any process. It not only gauges the performance of the employees but also sidelines its objectives against the set timelines. This approach guarantees the high quality standards for the audit strategy, reporting and execution. Hult (2008) suggest that it is of paramount importance that an organisation sets performance standards for health and safety. Tentatively, this process needs to be effective such as key aspects that pertains to health and safety and fully addressed (Hult, 2008). Reviewing performance Evaluation of performance highlights areas of weaknesses and will significantly improve poorly performed sectors within the organization. Ensuring that such evaluation process has been created effectively can sustain development across various levels. Contrariwise reviewing performance will enable the affected organisation to better manage its resources garnered towards the achievement of specific key attributes of the organisational process (Hult, 2008). More often than not, its inclusion enables a robust approach to reviewing all aspects affecting the organisation. This can range from employee empowerment to the effectiveness of systems set to address the organisation’s environment (Hult, 2008). Additionally, reviewing focuses on disseminating information that can otherwise be used in presenting proffered organisational analysis. Human Factors Human factors have a profound effect on individual and the group behaviour, yet it is in most cases overlooked when designing the work, with respect environmental, health and safety management. As such, organizations need to develop a safety and positive culture that enhances employee commitment and involvement at divergent levels. Personal factors are attributes linked to what the employees brings to the work environment- this may be strength and weaknesses pertaining to a particular task. Organizational safety culture is the product aspects that define a group and individuals attitudes, values, competencies and pattern; if the behaviours highlight commitment towards health and safety management. It is widely accepted in effectively controlling risks that are realized through individual behaviour of employees across a divergent aspect within the organization. Simply put, procedure and good systems control are not sufficient; it is how well the organization lives its system. Employee attitude and behaviour are significant aspects of organizational planning that considerably influences the way the organization addresses key issues affecting the organization. Simply put, Dunham (1984) suggests the multifaceted attitudes can be easily understood through the recognition of attitudes that have three distinct components namely cognitive, affective and behavioural aspects. This attitude towards process and systems implementation may induce a person to support or oppose the change. Nevertheless, in order for any system to be effective, it is imperative to clarify individual assumptions, attitude, and the beliefs. This is linked to the fact that potent leverage for sustainable and significant change rest on the human system at the center of any business system. Humans are unpredictable and have specific perspectives and attitudes that need to be consolidated in the system. Their consolidation in the work environment brings with it experiences and attitudes that shape various aspects of the organizational process. As a result, it creates an instant quandary that may be considerably contagious to other affected parties (Colquitt, 2011). Controlling such problems may be problematic. Culture consolidates artefacts, beliefs and values and underlying assumptions that organizational members share regarding appropriate behaviour (Reason, 1998). Despite numerous definition of culture; organizational culture is conceived from a holistic and social construct (Shah, 2003). Culture consolidates behaviours and beliefs present at various levels and is showcased throughout the organization’s life process. Attitude towards the implementation of process plays a mediating role in implementing change or affiliated approach (Quinlan, 2010). Attitude comprises of three aspects namely; behavioural, affective and cognitive; where these three types of attitude are crucial. An obstacle that ultimately affects the dispensation and development of initiated change is an obstacle of the “fear of the unknown “or “unfamiliarity.” This is attributed to the fact that once an individual has knowledge and information of potential alteration to be made, his feeling towards the intended change may be altered (Gatenby, 2009). It should be noted that handling cognitive functions regarding attitude change is a significantly multifaceted tasks if not well communicated to the affected individuals. This will be showcased by the behavioural model of the individuals responding to the system. An engaged employee is inclined to the business contests and functions with colleagues in improving the performance within the work environment that benefits the whole organization. In turn, the organization must effectively function to nurture and develop the employees (Storey, 2008). Hence, a set of the behaviours and attitudes that facilitate high job performance enables a high performance attuned to the organization’s mission (Gatenby, 2009). For instance, picture a situation where a new program addressing the need to include safety and health in all processing departments through reporting every 2 hours to the supervisor is included. The employees may perceive such actions as a means of measuring their performance. This perspective will define their attitude towards the initiative. Employees that develop such attitude may not oversee the successful integration of the program. Human factors effecting the implementation of Environment Management System System policy setters should recognize and identify human factors that affect its functionality in health and safety. Employee attitude towards the consolidation of environmental management systems consolidates various aspects. Employee empowerment, management commitment, rewards and the feedbacks may be significant predictors for attitude development and behaviours. Estrada (2010) studied the impact of employee perception pertaining implementation of EMS. It was evident from the findings that the management support for the EMS, employee’s psychological empowerment had a profound effect on the perceived environmental performance and a potential significant towards the failure and implementation of EMS. Top management functioning in an environmentally proactive organization ought to struggle towards the cultivation of a robust culture that facilitates the freedom of facilitating environmental improvement that lacks the excess management intervention (Estrada, 2010). The environment and safety will highlight what they will do or not do. The affected individuals need to accept the conditions that constraints of the implemented system. Thereafter the action employees take relies on their awareness of what is needed and how it is aligned to the overall organizational system. Case Study In 2010, Medina, Rost, McSween and Alvero published an article that offered a 20-year behavioural intervention, which highlighted the success of the initiative and durability of the behavioural change. The intervention occurred at an oil refinery where the plant managers had showcased a clear interest that effectively reduced injuries and facilitated a safety culture. A previous assessment highlighted that unsafe employee’s act contributed significantly towards the injuries. The intervention was introduced to one aspect of the refinery which showcased highest risks in most part of the injuries. In creating the plan, employee’s attitude was first addressed. This was realized through informing the employee on the basis for the intervention. Evidently, this approach was adequately structured to increase awareness from the team. It was imperative to consider the employee’s attitude towards the enhancement and development of the plan. A thorough safety assessment was conducted to specific past intervention. A design team that consisted of 10 workers volunteered; a committee leader and a manager were involved. A three-day workshop was initiated showcasing different behaviour analysis and a subsequent behavioural safety process. The team significantly identified basic safety values, where the behaviors showcasing the values were identified. A safety process was then created for each of the units which highlighted the values and practices for the affected units (Health and Safety Authority, 2012). Safety culture is represented as an assembly of attitude and characteristics in an individual and organization, which creates safety in the engagement of activities (Parker, 2006). Evidently, safety culture is imperative since it offers the context where the organizations form the platform where the safety attitudes are developed. On the other hand, health and safety are theorized as a manifestation of the safety culture in the behaviour that is showcased through the employee’s attitude (Johnstone, 2008). Impact of Attitude and Behaviour on HSE The success of the HSE sorely depends on the employee motivation towards the achievements of certain objectives stipulated under the system. A negative attitude towards the systems implies that affected individuals will not offer the proffered attitude garnered towards the attainment of the specific health and safety goal (Nja, 2010). In purely quantitative assertions, the importance of a positive attitude is instrumental in the realizing success within the organizational systems (Njaa, 2010). It is desirable to attain a positive user attitude that may have a significant beneficial impact on user’s behaviour, which contributes to the acceptance of the HSE implementation. Evidently, it has been suggested that positive individual attitude are an instrumental predicator of the system’s usage. More often than not, system implementers suggests for “user participation," which by definition is a set of activities, behaviour and assignment that engage the user throughout the process development (Reason, 1998). This participation consolidates various dimensions namely; hands on project related tasks, overall responsibility that pertains to the program and the relationship between the individuals and the HSE. In this regard, increasing user participation in various dimensions of the system increases the post development user attitude and development. The effectiveness of involvement of the system is enhanced in the case when the implementers realize that the users consider the system to be both significantly and personally important (Pidgeon, 1998). Tentatively , if the individual asserts that the systems is personally relevant , he is mostly likely to form a positive attitude towards the system since the attitude are significantly cemented on the basis of belief (Nja, 2010). An individual’s strength in is directly linked to the extremity of his attitudes towards the systems. Contrariwise, a high involvement could compel an extremely negative or positive attitude. It is advocated that a negative or positive attitude will directly affect the success of the project (Nja, 2010). On the other hand, a low involvement level leaves the individual susceptible to further influences such as factual arguments or persuasive forces. With an augmented user involvement and an increasingly positive attitude, the users will be inclined in the participating in the development of the system (Lee, 1993). On the other hand, a negative attitude towards the systems will suggest the employees are not attuned towards the support of the system. Resistance is a resultant effect that presupposes the individual’s lack of support for the intended project (Safe Work Australia, 2010). The lack of support would mean that the program will not be a success in divergent ways. Lack of support can be witnessed through the individual behaviour towards the implementation of the program. Resistive forces may be realized through various behavioural attributes (Nja, 2010). The individuals may be unwilling to implement the system throughout during its implementation. Additionally, they may respond through lacking support for developing the system’s framework. People resist technically, as a result of inadequate systems or rather if the systems have undesirable effects. Tentatively, the effective consolidation of the system necessitates the examination of pertinent aspects. This includes; i. The individual predisposition towards HSE (often relate to involvement with attitude regarding the present program) ii. Individual’s beliefs that pertain to the ability to contribute effectively during the development stages. It is evident that a low self-efficacy perception may result in an inhibition of the individual’s desire to participate in the system. It is imperative to offer opportunities where the individuals can judge their experiences in order to be successful. A failure in EMS implementation, suggests the individuals involved in the system have divergent behaviour and attitude. Evidently, dissimilar attitude that pertains to the systems is highlighted in different aspects. This showcases the relationship between attitude and behaviour; as such a negative attitude towards the system will suggest a behavioural response that does not support the systems. Contrariwise, a positive attitude will direct the individual’s behaviour towards the accomplishment of the desired goal. Limitation of Attitude and behaviours Work attitude and the behaviours are not closely linked to health and safety across divergent paradigms. Evidently, health and safety are multidimensional approaches that relates to health and safety. Some aspects pertaining an effective management app[roach could affect the way a system is adopted by employees. For example, picture a case where top management introduces a system that disrupts the functionality of the employees. This can be realized through ineffective decision making approach where an ineffective system is created. Conclusion Attitude and behaviours in the health and safety aspect has a profound effect with respect to the implementation of affiliated initiatives. It is evident that attitude plays an imperative role in the creation of the environment for the practitioners. This is largely due to divergent aspects that pertain to the individual’s perception. Work attitudes are not completely correct with respect to health and safety. It can be concluded therefore that attitude and behaviours have a compelling effect on an individual’s perception regarding the dispensation of health and safety systems. Reference List Colquitt, J. A., Lepine, J. A., & Wesson, M. J. 2011. Organizational Behavior. New York: McGrawHill/Irwin. Gatenby, M., Rees, C., Soane, E. and Truss, C., 2009. Employee engagement in context. London: Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development Lee, T.R., Macdonald, S., & Coote, J.A., 1993. Perception of Risk and Attitudes to Safety at a Nuclear Reprocessing Plant. Paper presented at Society for Risk Assessment, Europe. Johnstone, R., & King, M., 2008. A responsive sanction to promote systematic compliance? Enforceable undertakings in occupational health and safety regulation. Australian Journal of Labour Law. 21(3) 280 - 315. Health and Safety Authority, 2012, Accessed from . Hult, G., Ketchen, D., Griffith, D., Cavusgil, S., 2008. An assessment of the Measurement of Performance in International Business Research. Journal of International Business Studies. 39: 1064-1080. Reason, J., 1998. Achieving a safe culture: theory and practice’ in Work & Stress. 12(3): 293 – 306. Pidgeon, N., 1998. Safety culture: key theoretical issues in Work & Stress. 12(3): 202-216. Shah, S., Silverstein, B., and Foley, M., 2003. Workplace Health and Safety Regulations: Impact of Enforcement and Consultation on Workers Compensation Claims Rates in Washington State With Two Years Follow-Up. SHARP Technical Report Number 70-2-2003, Safety and Health Assessment and Research for Prevention Program, Washington State Department of Labor and Industries, Washington, 2003. Storey, J., Wright, P., Ulrich, D., 2008. The Routledge Companion to Strategic Human Resource Management. Nja, O., and Fjelltun, S., 2010. Managers’ attitudes towards safety measures in the commercial road transport sector. Safety Science, 48: 1073-1080. Probst, T., and Estrada, A., 2010. Accident under-reporting among employees: testing the moderating influence of psychological safety climate and supervisor enforcement of safety practices. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 42(5): 1438-1444. Parker D, Lawrie, M., and Hudson, P., 2006. A framework for understanding the development of organizational safety culture’, Safety Science, 44(6), 551-562. Quinlan, M., Bohle, P., and Lamm, F., 2010. Managing Occupational Health and Safety (3rd ed.), Palgrave Macmillan, Melbourne. Safe Work Australia, 2010. Main Report for Safe Work Australia. Motivations, Attitudes, Perceptions and Skills (MAPS), unpublished report, Safe Work Australia, Canberra, Williams, C, and McWilliams, A, 2010, MGMT, 1stAsia-Pacific edition, Cengage Learning Australia Limited, South Melbourne. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(Guidelines and Codes in Helping Organizations Analysis the Safety Report, n.d.)
Guidelines and Codes in Helping Organizations Analysis the Safety Report. https://studentshare.org/human-resources/2053033-assessment-1
(Guidelines and Codes in Helping Organizations Analysis the Safety Report)
Guidelines and Codes in Helping Organizations Analysis the Safety Report. https://studentshare.org/human-resources/2053033-assessment-1.
“Guidelines and Codes in Helping Organizations Analysis the Safety Report”. https://studentshare.org/human-resources/2053033-assessment-1.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Safety Performance of the Organization

OHS Safety Management System National Implementation Project

The aim of this project is to develop one safety management system throughout the company nationally.... This will determine how safety is managed on these sites.... The implementation of a national safety management system will take place in four phases which will be used as an outline for evaluating the effectiveness of project implementation.... Phase one will involve planning of OHS national safety management system.... Phase two will focus on reactive safety management processes....
7 Pages (1750 words) Research Paper

Health and Safety Management

The concept of safety culture was first introduced in order to explain how the organization's lack of knowledge and understanding of risk and safety could lead to disaster.... Knowledge of health and safety management through HSG 65 is aimed at directors, managers, supervisors, owners of small firms, employee representatives, and other key players in the organization who can effectively put into both policies and practice the significance of effectively managing health and safety....
8 Pages (2000 words) Essay

Health and safety issues

Repeat – benchmarking is a process that needs to be carried out repeatedly if one needs to improve the performance of the organization. ... In essence, World Health (1983) argues that health and safety management that is effective is fundamental to the well-being of employees, plays a vital role in ensuring that the reputation of the organization is maintained while at the same time helping in creating teams that are highly achieving. ... This is achieved through: improvement of management systems so as to reduce injuries at work, showing the board how important health and safety issues are, monitoring of health and safety issues in the organization and providing of detailed reports about their states not excluding their stray performances....
3 Pages (750 words) Essay

How organisational culture and safety influence on project performance in organisations

The paper tells that generally it is believed that organizational culture is one of the factors which influence the performance of the construction industry.... These features results in negatively affecting the overall performance of the industry.... The research would be helpful in determining the degree to which culture influence safety and performance of the project.... conducted research study regarding the safety climate of the construction industry and concluded that the safety is highly important for improving the overall performance of the construction organizations and thus provided a framework for measuring the safety climate of a construction company....
27 Pages (6750 words) Essay

Principles of Organizational Performance Management

Furthermore, amidst various domains of performance management scorecard, the essay discusses about the notion of employee engagement in order to enhance the performance of a healthcare organization.... The essay is designed to develop a performance management scorecard for a healthcare organization.... This peper presents healthcare organizations which experience poor performance with respect to quality of services.... In this context, it can be stated that it is the responsibility of nursing professionals to preserve their respective performance engaged in varied healthcare organizations....
7 Pages (1750 words) Admission/Application Essay

Explaining governmental organizational structure

NASAO is an exceptional organization among aviation advocates Groups that Impact Aviation Affiliation Associations, Organizations, and/or Lobbying Groups that Impact Aviation The aviation industry is a diverse composite of organizations and businesses that join in advocacy efforts to ensure a smooth flow of operations.... NASAO is an exceptional organization among aviation advocates because unlike others, which speak for a single type of activity, it represents the men and women in the state's government aviation agencies, who serve the public interests....
1 Pages (250 words) Essay

Occupational Health and Safety

The paper "Occupational Health and Safety" describes how a risk management process might be built into a business's OHS employment procedures, besides the OHS TQM approach, describes two other alternative OHS systems that are available for the management of OHS for the organization to consider.... However, the costs arising from accidents occurring in the workplace serve to increase the organization's costs.... It is customer focussed and follows a systematic approach to continuous organization performance improvement....
6 Pages (1500 words) Case Study

Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care and its Role in Error Reduction

The 'Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care [ACSQHC]' is an entity that was established and officially recognized on the 1st of January 2006 under the 'Public Governance, performance and Accountability Act 2013'.... The 'Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care [ACSQHC]' is an entity that was established and officially recognized on the 1st of January 2006 under the 'Public Governance, performance and Accountability Act 2013'....
6 Pages (1500 words) Term Paper
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us