StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Philosophical Conceptions of Justice - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
Philosophical Conceptions of Justice People of diverse cultures and ethnicities make up the world. This means that different people perceive justice in different ways depending on the people around them and their ways of life and intellectual capabilities…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER93.8% of users find it useful
Philosophical Conceptions of Justice
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Philosophical Conceptions of Justice"

? Philosophical Conceptions of Justice Introduction Philosophical Conceptions of Justice People of diverse cultures and ethnicities make up the world. This means that different people perceive justice in different ways depending on the people around them and their ways of life and intellectual capabilities. However, justice, in a universal definition, entails the knowledge of doing right from wrong and making sure people live in the right way together. It is this ‘right’ way of living that brings controversies in describing social justice among nations. This paper discusses a variety of philosophical conceptions of justice with regard to famous philosophers in their definitions of social justice (Ackerman, 1980). John Locke and Thomas Jefferson John Locke lived in the mid seventeenth century as an English Enlightenment philosopher. He argued that our ancestors once lived in a state of nature that had no government or laws. However, as life advanced and civilization came up, people became stratified into various social classes that required the formulation of laws and regulations in order to cater for the less disadvantaged. This also prohibited the oppression of the less fortunate by the more fortunate. He called this idea of the social contract that enabled all citizens acquire fundamental rights of life, property, and liberty. However, this depended on people’s consent that he said are an active part of the social contract in which they take part depending on their own accord (Chaffee, 2004). Consequently, a twenty first century philosopher, Chaffee, analyses Locke’s writings in addition to other various ancient philosophers. He says that Locke’s theory is political in that he took up Hobbe’s opinion of human equality and the social contract. Furthermore, he also puts Aristotle’s arguments forward that man is naturally a social creature who cannot survive alone. This means that humanity is fundamentally a social identity and that there is no need to put up a system to control our way of life. However, Hobbes described how this natural socialism could lead to relinquishment of certain rights by high status individuals, hence, leading to oppression and injustice. On the other hand, Thomas Jefferson, the third president of the United States was a profound follower of Locke’s arguments. He believed that every human being is equal and that God gave each unique rights, including liberty, life, and the right to be happy and content. He created his government on the basis that it enabled his people to secure these rights. However, the people still held the right to overthrow the government if they felt that its constitution was not in favor of their happiness and safety. As a result, I believe in Locke’s way of thinking that nowadays life requires a body, like the government, that controls the provision and use of resources on the basis that we are all equal regardless of an individual’s social status. This is because it defines true independence (Marx, 1938). Conceptions of justice Liberalism denotes a free way of acting and thinking in public and private life. It focuses on the role of an individual to possess the power to think and act in whatever way that he or she likes. It is a philosophical view based on Aristotle and Plato’s arguments on justice as was recommended by Locke as the key to a just way of life. It rejects state religion, hereditary privilege, and absolute monarchy as notions that favor inequality among the public and private. In the 19th, liberalism advanced to a political ideology called classical liberalism. This liberalism was still based on the initial liberalism ideas although it advocated for political freedom and civil liberties while opposing how the government interfered with economic freedom. On the other hand, socialism describes an economic ideology that entails social possession of resources, including the ways of production of these resources. It also entails mutual organization of the economy that focuses on benefiting the public as a whole instead of specific individuals or groups (Ebenstein, 1985). According to Ebenstein, human behavior, economic practices, and values are mainly dependent on the social environment. Thus, this rejects the social contact notion that these aspects depend on natural law. As a result, it urges people to work to obtain goods and services. However, this prohibits people from developing their individual talents and pursuing individual interests. Capitalism is another economic ideology that focuses on private ownership of resources and their utilization for profit. It relies from Hobbes’ point of view that human beings are generally competitive in nature whereby, they always aim to be better than their counterparts are. As a result, accumulation of wealth forms the core element of capitalism. Furthermore, the fact that sharing of goods and services is voluntary prohibits the power of the government and political leaders to coerce. Hence, capitalism promotes social inequality with power and wealth being distributed to certain people while others become poorer and more miserable. In terms of governments or states, it leads to oligarchy where some countries have to depend on superior nations for survival and upkeep of their citizens. This, to me, is injustice and I think it has played a monumental part to the formation and maintenance of third world countries. Communism, conversely, involves a stateless and classless social order that functions based on common ownership of resources and their utilization. According to Burell (2011), the ideology behind communism is economic and social, as well as social. It is just in that it allows distribution of resources based on a person’s need where the social relations between individuals are free. Differences between capitalism and socialism The establishment of capitalism in the eighteenth century, after the Industrial revolution, led to displacement of massive populations from the countryside to urban centers. This, thus, led to the establishment of social classes that exploited and dominated other classes leading to social inequality and injustice. This was unlike during the era of socialism where members of the community lived together without stratification of social classes or the existence of a coercive system. According to Burell (2011), private ownership and employment that had low wages were the main aspects that promoted social inequality during capitalism. Differences between liberalism and socialism Liberalism is a political philosophy, which is founded on the basis of equity and liberty. It is characterized by fair and free elections, freedom of press, civil rights, free trade, freedom of worship, and rights to life, property, and liberty. This was the first philosophy in the era of enlightenment. On the other hand, socialism is characterized by social ownership of property among other tools of production. It also entails social cooperation in production and management of goods and services. Most nations adopted this political philosophy during the revolution age (Ackerman, 1980). Differences between capitalism and communism In capitalism, the government uses a democratic way of ruling while in communism; it is totalitarian. Furthermore, communism involves property being owned by the state while in capitalism it is owned by private individuals. According to Burell (2011), capitalism is also governed by free enterprise unlike communism where this is not allowed. Here, wealth is distributed equally and healthcare and education provided by the government instead of private entities in capitalism. Lastly, capitalism focuses on an individual’s progress while communism entails the community as an entirely single unit. Conclusion From the above explanation, liberalism promotes justice as compared to the other political philosophies. It encourages one to work hard as ones effort is not for the benefit of the public. Nations such as Russia applied socialism, and it did not do good to the citizen as there is no personal driving force. This means that a nation adopting liberalism will also grow economically faster that a nation adopting socialism among other systems. References Ackerman, B. A. (1980). Social justice in the liberal state. New Haven: Yale U.P Burrell, J. (2011). Work is for the people: A treatise on the -isms. New York: Algora Pub. Chaffee, J. (2004).The philosopher’s way: Thinking critically about profound ideas. (4th ed.). New York, NY: Pearson. Ebenstein, W. (1985). Today's isms: Communism, fascism, capitalism, socialism. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Philosophical Conceptions of Justice Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words”, n.d.)
Philosophical Conceptions of Justice Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1465228-what-is-your-theory-of-justice-sociopolitical
(Philosophical Conceptions of Justice Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 Words)
Philosophical Conceptions of Justice Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 Words. https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1465228-what-is-your-theory-of-justice-sociopolitical.
“Philosophical Conceptions of Justice Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1465228-what-is-your-theory-of-justice-sociopolitical.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Philosophical Conceptions of Justice

Rawls Justice as Fairness: a Political Conception

nbsp;Questions germane to issues of justice, human nature, and the political have long been part of the ongoing discourse pertinent to understanding human predicament.... This helps in knowing Rawls' conception of justice.... The paper "Rawls' justice as Fairness: a Political Conception" tells us about human person is ascertained.... nbsp;  In this regard, this paper will undertake a critical evaluation of political liberalism to justify “justice as fairness” as a political conception....
21 Pages (5250 words) Term Paper

John Locke and property righs

The Rawlsian Philosophy John Rawls' theory of justice is one of the most interesting philosophies to have emerged in modern times.... It was introduced in the 1970s when A Theory of justice was published.... Rawls contended that all of us are ignorant about ourselves and about others and, hence, we are not in a position - in such condition - to determine or apply the principles of justice.... The Rawlsian theory of justice is influenced by Hume's philosophy with its critique of justice, that which prioritizes conventions and universal meaning (Forbes, 1985, 68)....
3 Pages (750 words) Essay

Sexual Citizenship

The concept of identity has been brought under philosophical scrutiny, as identity politics has fallen in and out of favor.... The concept of identity has been brought under philosophical scrutiny, as identity politics has fallen in and out of favor.... At the philosophical level, it is one of the major issues of the day.... Luce Irigaray has this to say about the philosophical importance of sexual difference: Sexual difference is one of the major philosophical issues, if not the issue, of our age....
8 Pages (2000 words) Essay

Does the Philosophy of Law Have Any Practical Value or is it Just a Mental Exercise

"What philosophy is, or should be, is itself a philosophical question that philosophers have understood and treated differently through the ages.... This second definition mentions most of the issues that have given rise to a wide-ranging concatenation of philosophical treatise and thought concerning the philosophy behind and used in the creation of a body of laws meant to guide the individual in their dealings both in rem and in persona....
20 Pages (5000 words) Essay

Philosophy: Redistribution or Recognition (Fraser)'s paper

The politics of recognition takes into account the very definition of social justice itself, that is, that which pertains to what is right as opposed to only considering what is the good, which traditional conceptions of social justice found difficult to give a definitive… Also, recognition not only questions injustices based on the matter of unequal distribution of wealth, economic class, and labor, but rather, goes further as to probe into questions that concern social status and the cultural values that have been determined by cussions on recognition and redistribution differ in four ways: first, they have different definitions of what injustice is in that redistribution regards injustice as rooted in economic causes whereas recognition sees injustice as cultural; second, both have different remedies for injustice, where redistribution sees economic restructuring as the answer and recognition requires cultural or symbolic change; third, they identify different bodies who are the victims of injustice, where redistribution sees classes, reminiscent of the Marxist definition, as victims, whereas recognition sees those who enjoy lesser esteem, respect, and prestige as the victims; and finally, each assumes different understandings of group differences, that is, redistribution sees differences as social constructs resulting from an unjust political economy, whereas recognition assumes that social differences stem from the hierarchical values assigned to them....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

The integration of the philosophical foundations of human rights

he concept of human rights raises problems that are, on the one hand, practical and urgent, and on the other hand, theoretical and abstract” (Freeman, “The philosophical Foundation of Human Rights”).... One such significance behind providing comparatively lesser significance towards philosophical explanations concerning human rights can be identified as the complex presentation of the related theories.... Thus, effort needs to be made in order to minimise the complexities in the philosophical views of human rights with the intention to reduce challenge in terms of implementation (Freeman, “The philosophical Foundation of Human Rights”)....
23 Pages (5750 words) Thesis

Philosophical and Practical Approach for Balancing Issues

This paper will, therefore, discuss the philosophical and practical approach for balancing issues such as individual rights and the public protection, use of reward and punishment in criminal justice, and techniques employed for weighing the use of immoral ways to accomplish desirable ends.... Moreover, recommendations to employ ethics in decision making about the mentioned issues in criminal justice will be discussed.... The most common problems arising within the community today are problems concerning individual rights as well as public protection, conduct codes for criminal justice, and morality....
5 Pages (1250 words) Assignment

Modern Ideas of Conservatism

hellip; According to Kukathas (2003), political liberalism is a modification to John Rawls's theory of justice.... He attempted to show that his theory of justice is not the all-inclusive origin of the good.... Instead, compatible with a liberal origin of the role of justice that the government should be neutral between competing conceptions of good.... Therefore, they expect unity among conservatives on various questions concerning philosophical or theological values that are usually misguided....
6 Pages (1500 words) Assignment
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us