StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Mandatory Mental Health Services - Case Study Example

Cite this document
Summary
The paper "Mandatory Mental Health Services" highlights that we need to keep in mind that the Mental Health Act 1996 did not solve all of the problems that it set out to do: “Community treatment orders alone do not reduce admissions” (Kisely et al 2004)…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER94.6% of users find it useful
Mandatory Mental Health Services
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Mandatory Mental Health Services"

Review of Mandatory Mental Health Services The Mental Health Act 1996 contains of provision for the mandatory hospitalisation of patients for certain circumstances. As quoted from the act, “A person should be an involuntary patient only if- (a) the person has a mental illness requiring treatment; (b) the treatment can be provided through detention in an authorised hospital or through a community treatment order and is required to be so provided in order” (1996: 20). Specifically, Reasons for involuntary patient status include “(i) to protect the health or safety of that person or any other person; (ii) to protect the person from self-inflicted harm of a kind described in subsection (2); or (iii) to prevent the person from doing serious damage to any property” (1996: 20). The Act also includes provisions for early release of patients with mandatory community treatment orders. While there are more specifics to the conditions of being an involuntary patient, these basic guidelines are enough to understand the specific aspect of the Mental Health Act 1996 in order to be able to discuss the effects of the this act. Where this is specifically concerned is in regards to the Medical Treatment Act of 1988. The Act “clarifies the right existing under common law to refuse medical treatment” and “creates an offence of medical trespass where a medical practitioner carries out or continues any procedure or treatment that a competent person refuses” (MTA 2008). Most countries and governments have some version of this law enacted. The difficulty of having both this type of law enacted and the Mental Health Act 1996 is in the phrasing of “a competent person.” What constitutes a competent person might be open to interpretation. Furthermore, this wording might have been chosen to refer specifically to patients who were in an accident of some sort and were not conscious to a degree of being able to make informed decisions about the healthcare to be received. However, the problem is that there are not typically single events which set off mental health problems. To confound the problem even further, a patient might not be considered competent to refuse medication before receiving the kind of medication that the patient would ultimately receive; upon receiving the medication and gaining the mental faculty to do so, the patient should then have the right to be able to refuse medical treatment in accordance with the law. If a competent person is forced to receive medication, even if that medication is what is making the person competent, then to what extent should we consider this a human rights violation. Considering the severity of the implications of the possible human rights violation that might occur given patients’ inability to refuse treatment under the Act, it must be taken into consideration whether or not the measures are effective: “Detention and involuntary treatment represents a severe infringement of basic human and common law rights including freedom of movement and the right to refuse medical treatment” (Review 2007:6). If there are no gains to be made through these measures, or if the gains are too small, obviously there would be no reason for these kinds of human rights violations. “The principle of reciprocity suggests that where governments curtail freedoms they incur a reciprocal responsibility to provide for the best interests of the person whose rights are curtailed” (Review 2007:6). If the best interests of the involuntary patients are not being met, then the human rights violations should be put an end to quickly. The other option would be to determine the best way to ensure that the patients’ best interests would be met to justify the human rights violations. Beyond the detention of patients who are likely to incur harm upon themselves or upon others, the Act is meant to lower the costs of the mental health costs to the state by reducing the amount of time that patients are hospitalised. If the total costs of services incurred are not significantly lower than regular hospital stays, then the mandatory community treatment orders and the compulsory taking of medication is not an effective way to either treat patients or to lower costs in any way that’s beneficial to the state. There are many aspects of these measures which need to be studied. Varying factors make getting precise statistics problematic, and without precise statistics there is no way to determine how effective these measures actually are. Let us first consider the following statistic: “The majority of involuntary patients (approximately 65%) are taken off that status by their psychiatrist within the first 28 days of the order” (Barber 2001:36). This statistic by itself seem encouraging and positive, though we need to examine the rates of readmission, especially involuntary readmission, in regards to how we should determine what to think of this particular statistic. Also, we need to examine the rate of violent patients in regards to which patients are taken off of the involuntary status. It is likely that violence prone patients more than likely are not being released as readily as patients who are not prone to violence, and it is these patients who are going to be in need to extended hospital stays anyways. Considering this, it does not seem as though these patients should not be considered to be the same in regards to these studies and these statistics. As we can see, there are many facets to consider, and the more the problem is examined, the problem difficult the problem becomes. The studies that have been made to probe the question as to the effectiveness of these measures have had mixed results. Various studies have found different degrees of results, yet they do generally tend to agree that the current measures need to be improved upon for their overall effectiveness if the Act is to continue in anything close to its current version. Without any changes, the current version of the Act will not be able to affect the changes that it was meant to do. In one study, “Various forms of compulsory treatment in the community have been suggested as being effective in reducing use of services by patients with mental health disorders” (Preston et al 2002). This would suggest that, at least in this capacity, the measures are at least partially successful in reducing patients’ dependence upon the use of services. This alone is not on its own enough to suggest that the Act is effective as it should be. This is because the researchers found overall that “The study therefore raises questions about the effectiveness of such an invasive procedure as enforcing treatment in the community” (Preston et al 2002). Another study that at least partially found the Act to be effective said that “Community treatment orders can be a useful tool for some but not necessarily all objectives. In the form of conditional release, orders reduce the likelihood of extended hospital stays. As a means to prevent hospitalization, the utility of community treatment orders is more complex, being dependent on services provided and on the judicious selection of person for those orders” (Segel et al 2009). As we can see, this is a rather complex issue with many sides to consider. While the Act was effective to an extent in reducing the likelihood of extended hospital stays, the measures were not effective in preventing any or all future hospitalisations. It would seem as though one way to interpret this data would be to say that patients’ problems are merely being dealt with in the short term, but over an extended period we can see that patients are not being effectively treated to the extent of not needing further hospitalisations. Since this is the case, for this provision of the Act to be improved upon, psychiatrists must be able to decrease the need for future hospitalisations, because the entire point of compulsory community treatment is to reduce the time patients spend in the hospital. If, for instance, patients might be better served by being hospitalised for an extended period until their issues and mental health problems are properly dealt with, then compulsory community treatment has no real purpose. It might simply be a matter of the Act and its measures being more or less a revolving door, and while each visit might be shorter on its own, if the overall long term hospitalisation times add up to more time than one single extended hospital stay, then obviously the patients’ best interests are not being served and the human rights violation are meaningless. One of the main reasons behind these measures is because many of the patients who are affected by the involuntary patient status do not have the mental capacity to realise that they are in need of any sort of treatment by mental health professionals. Since the severity of these patients’ conditions would mandate that these patients would probably be unaware of human rights violations that were being incurred against them, it is important that the utmost care is taken in dealing with these patients. The United Nations has been monitoring the legislation in the countries which feature the sort of involuntary patient measures as what is featured in Australia. The United States and the UK both have similar sorts of measures in place, though each country is different in the exact wording and implications of legislation. What is interesting is that all countries tend to have similar results in regards to studies that attempt to determine the effectiveness of these measures, such as the studies that have been mentioned previously. In regards to Australia and the Mental Health Act 1996, “The United Nations Association of Australia believes that it is imperative for United Nations Conventions and Principles be incorporated into the wording of the Mental Health Act” (Clark 2003). Furthermore, the report stated that: It is disappointing to see that no where in the Act were the Principles specifically mentioned…We also believe that the Review should be aware of Australia’s human rights obligations as set out in the six main United Nations Conventions on human rights that have been signed and ratified by Australia (Clark 2003). Though mere wording of legislation alone cannot solve a problem if the laws and rules are not followed or misinterpreted, it is important to follow these guidelines as Australia has in fact already agreed to do so. This might be a small part of the problem, but ever part of the problem must be addressed in order for it to be solved. In conclusion, we need to keep in mind that the Mental Health Act 1996 did not solve all of the problems that it set out to do: “Community treatment orders alone do not reduce admissions” (Kisely et al 2004). It did, however, create more problems to deal with in regards to worrying about the extent to which human rights are being violated. As such, “Evaluation of the outcome should be included if this type of legislation is introduced” (Kisely et al 2004). As all of the studies mentioned have found, there needs to be further refining of the measures in order to achieve maximum effectiveness, and if the results yielded cannot be improved upon, the entire involuntary patient and compulsory community treatment aspect of the Act need to be done away with. Works Cited Australian Government, 2009 Mental Health Act 1996. Government printing service. Accessed February 2009, www.health.wa.gov.au/mhareview/resources/legislation/wa_mental_health_act_1996.pdf Australian Government, 2008 Medical Treatment Act. Government printing service. Accessed February 2009, http://www.health.vic.gov.au/mta/ Anglicare, 2007 Review of the Mental Health Act 1996. Anglicare printing services. Accessed February 2009, http://www.anglicare-tas.org.au/index.php?option=com_docman&task=doc_view&gid=72&Itemid=86. Barber, N. 2001 Mental Health Report 2001. Government printing services. Accessed February 2009, http://www.health.wa.gov.au/mhareview/resources/documents/Neville_Barber_Paper.pdf. Clark, C, 2003 Review of the Mental Health Act (MHA) 1996. Government printing services. Accessed February 2009, http://www.health.wa.gov.au/mhareview/submissions/docs/UN.A%20of%20AUS.pdf. Jones, C., Strengthening safeguards and support: Review of the MHA 1996. 2007. Government printing services. Accessed February 2009, http://www.health.wa.gov.au/mhareview/submissions/docs/UN.A%20of%20AUS.pdf. Kisely, S, Xiaou, J, Preston, N, 2004 “Impact of compulsory community treatment on admission rates.” British Journal of Psychiatry; 184: 432-438. Preston, N, Kisely, S, Xiaou, J, 2002 “Assessing the outcome of compulsory treatment in the community: Epidemiological study in Western Australia,” BMJ; 324: 244. Segal, S, Preston, N, Kisely, P, Xiaou, J, 2009 “Conditional release in Western Australia: Effect on hospital length of stay.” Psychiatric Services ; 60: 94-99. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(Mandatory Mental Health Services Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words, n.d.)
Mandatory Mental Health Services Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/health-sciences-medicine/1719732-sgy310sp4-human-services-policy-analysis-report-1500-to-2000-words
(Mandatory Mental Health Services Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words)
Mandatory Mental Health Services Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words. https://studentshare.org/health-sciences-medicine/1719732-sgy310sp4-human-services-policy-analysis-report-1500-to-2000-words.
“Mandatory Mental Health Services Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/health-sciences-medicine/1719732-sgy310sp4-human-services-policy-analysis-report-1500-to-2000-words.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Mandatory Mental Health Services

Home Care in the United States - Home and Community Based Medicaid Services

To enable states to provide more comprehensive long-term care services the Department of Medicaid services (DMS), through the Secretary of the US Department of Health and Human services (HHS), are allowed to grant waiver programs to provide Medicaid recipients with home and community based services through an array of home and community based programs.... hellip; These programs include services such as case management, homemakers, home health aides, personal care, adult day health rehabilitation, and respite care among others where Ohio and Kentucky are both participants in the program. To address home health care needs and decrease the state's expenditures with regard to institutional care, Ohio has applied for a number of waivers under Section 1915 (c) of the Social Security Act through its Home Care Waiver services, PASSPORT Waiver, Transition Waiver, Individual Options Waiver, and Level One Waiver; administrated through the coordinated efforts of the Ohio Department of Job and Family services (ODJFS), the Ohio Department of Mental Retardation an d Developmental Disabilities (ODMRDD), and the Ohio Department of Aging (Ohio Legal Rights Service [OLRS] 2005, 'Medicaid Waiver Programs in Ohio')....
3 Pages (750 words) Essay

American Association of Retired Persons

President of AARP services Dawn Sweeney claims this relationship will assist members to wade through the clutter of wellness and health issues.... This essay describes the interest group of the researcher, that is an American Association of Retired Persons (AARP).... The researcher analyzes and discusses the history and most significant aims of this group as well as discusses numerous benefits that being an AARP member provide....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

Swine Flu Vaccination of Pregnant Women

) Consent: What you have a right to expect, National health services United Kingdom, viewed 02 November 2009 from https://www.... ased on a patient's Right to Self-determination, a patient has the right to refuse treatment and consequently, he has the right to refuse vaccination (mental health Act, as quoted by Leino-Kilpi, 2000).... Department of health in the UK also reports that the swine flu vaccine can offer the pregnant woman and her foetus some form of protection against the disease and concerns over safety are baseless (Press Association, 2009)....
2 Pages (500 words) Essay

Universal Health Care to All the Citizens of Any Nation

The paper "Universal health Care to All the Citizens of Any Nation" states that unfortunately, the salaries offered to doctors are very meagre and good quality service is not possible in a universal health care system.... hellip; The report of the UK government's National Audit Office published in 2003 made an international comparison of ten different health care systems in developed nations, with one non-universal system (USA), and the results suggested that the universal health care system is relatively cheaper than that of the non-universal health care system....
2 Pages (500 words) Coursework

The Effects of the governmental mandatory furlough policy on employees in Michigan

In addition, their health and dental insurances are also unaffected by these mandatory days (Kingdon & Thurber, 2010).... mandatory governmental Furlough programs are charged with ensuring that employees within the Michigan state take their unpaid leaves to attend to a company's specific needs that may arise from the economic conditions or the employer's financial position (Morris, 2005).... Furlough programs that are mandatory within the state of Michigan have been implemented for the purpose of addressing the budget shortfalls that have faced the city (Bureau of National Affairs, 2009)....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay

Health Needs of Women in the United States

women of childbearing age,' that the Public health Journal published on May 1, 2011.... The study aimed at investigating factors to women's oral health.... This… Public health policy makers as well as general nurses and public health nurses are other classes of audience because the research objective health needs of women in the United s Kaylor, Polivka, Chaudry, Salsberry and Wee ed the article, ‘Dental insurance and dental service useby U....
1 Pages (250 words) Essay

Policy That Guides Community Services for Older Adults

It enables the elderly to access different health services for treatment, rehabilitation, and treatment.... Medicare is influenced by law, for example, it is not allowed by the law to provide benefits for… The only preventive services allowed are the ones covered through the change in Medicare Act.... This paper will discuss a policy that is associated with community services for older adults and their families.... The areas covered by part A include hospice services, some home health care, inpatient hospital care and skilled nursing benefits....
8 Pages (2000 words) Research Paper

The Role of Assessment in Care in the UK

The CPA gives importance to the coordinated effort of social and health services and also stresses the requirements to involve both carers and service users to result in a better outcome to the mental health care requirement of the patient (Warner, L p.... This paper "The Role of Assessment in Care in the UK" discusses the implementation of the Care Programme Approach as required by The mental health Act Code of Practice has resulted in positive outcomes on mental health patients....
8 Pages (2000 words) Term Paper
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us